qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v11 29/31] linux-user: Implement CPU-specific signal handler


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 29/31] linux-user: Implement CPU-specific signal handler for loongarch64 hosts
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 13:48:21 +0100

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 4:50 AM WANG Xuerui <i.qemu@xen0n.name> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 12/30/21 11:11, gaosong wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> On 2021/12/21 下午1:41, WANG Xuerui wrote:
>
> +    case 0b001110: /* indexed, atomic, bounds-checking memory operations */
> +        uint32_t sel = (insn >> 15) & 0b11111111111;
> +
> +        switch (sel) {
> +        case 0b00000100000: /* stx.b */
> +        case 0b00000101000: /* stx.h */
> +        case 0b00000110000: /* stx.w */
> +        case 0b00000111000: /* stx.d */
> +        case 0b00001110000: /* fstx.s */
> +        case 0b00001111000: /* fstx.d */
> +        case 0b00011101100: /* fstgt.s */
> +        case 0b00011101101: /* fstgt.d */
> +        case 0b00011101110: /* fstle.s */
> +        case 0b00011101111: /* fstle.d */
> +        case 0b00011111000: /* stgt.b */
> +        case 0b00011111001: /* stgt.h */
> +        case 0b00011111010: /* stgt.w */
> +        case 0b00011111011: /* stgt.d */
> +        case 0b00011111100: /* stle.b */
> +        case 0b00011111101: /* stle.h */
> +        case 0b00011111110: /* stle.w */
> +        case 0b00011111111: /* stle.d */
> +        case 0b00011000000 ... 0b00011100011: /* am* insns */
> +            return true;
> +        }
> +        break;
> +    }
>
> We build qemu-x86_64 on LoongArch machine, but got an error,
>
> ../linux-user/host/loongarch64/host-signal.h:57:9: error: a label can only be 
> part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement
>          uint32_t sel = (insn >> 15) & 0b11111111111;
>          ^~~~~~~~
>
> I think  we should define  'sel'  before:
>
>     /* Detect store by reading the instruction at the program counter.  */
>     switch ((insn >> 26) & 0b111111) {
>
> or
> case 0b001110:
>
>      {
>
>           uint32_t set = ...;
>
>           ...
>
>      }
>
> I can't reproduce the error on both my development machines (amd64 and 
> loongarch64), so I wonder if the issue is related to your particular setup 
> (i.e. compiler versions and such)?

I can reproduce, setup:

Project version: 6.2.50
C compiler for the host machine: cc (gcc 8.3.0 "cc (Loongnix
8.3.0-6.lnd.vec.27) 8.3.0")
C linker for the host machine: cc ld.bfd 2.31.1-system
Host machine cpu family: loongarch64
Host machine cpu: loongarch64
C++ compiler for the host machine: c++ (gcc 8.3.0 "c++ (Loongnix
8.3.0-6.lnd.vec.27) 8.3.0")
C++ linker for the host machine: c++ ld.bfd 2.31.1-system



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]