[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: hexagon container update
From: |
Brian Cain |
Subject: |
RE: hexagon container update |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Jan 2022 03:36:08 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Cain
> Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 7:23 PM
> To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>; Alex Bennée
> <alex.bennee@linaro.org>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: Taylor Simpson <tsimpson@quicinc.com>
> Subject: RE: hexagon container update
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Cain
> ...
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> > ...
> > > On 10/1/21 12:59 PM, Brian Cain wrote:
> > > > Alex,
> > > >
> > > > We need to update the docker container used for hexagon for new test
> > cases
> > > proposed in Taylor's recent patch series under review. Thankfully,
> > CodeLinaro
> > > has provided a binary of the hexagon cross toolchain so now I think we can
> > > simplify the hexagon docker file to something like the below. I hope this
> also
> > > means that we can remove the exceptional handling for the hexagon
> > container.
We had some issues with the previous attempt to update the container. The
linux-user "signals" test failed. Richard pointed out that the archive of the
C library had what looks like a defect that would cause the test to fail.
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg849635.html
I'm following up now with a workaround - the attached patch references a
toolchain which avoids the problem and passes the signals test. This toolchain
is based on llvm+clang 13.0.1-rc2. BTW, the release page has a signature
provided in case anyone wants to verify the download:
https://github.com/quic/toolchain_for_hexagon/releases/tag/13.0.1-rc2_
Can we try again with this new container definition?
-Brian
0001-Update-Hexagon-toolchain-to-13.0.1-rc2.patch
Description: 0001-Update-Hexagon-toolchain-to-13.0.1-rc2.patch
- RE: hexagon container update,
Brian Cain <=