qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio: fix the condition for iommu_platform not supp


From: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio: fix the condition for iommu_platform not supported
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 16:31:22 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0



On 2/1/22 15:33, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 12:36:25 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

+    vdev_has_iommu = virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
       if (klass->get_dma_as != NULL && has_iommu) {
           virtio_add_feature(&vdev->host_features, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
           vdev->dma_as = klass->get_dma_as(qbus->parent);
+        if (!vdev_has_iommu && vdev->dma_as != &address_space_memory) {
+            error_setg(errp,
+                       "iommu_platform=true is not supported by the device");
+        }


       } else {
           vdev->dma_as = &address_space_memory;
       }


I struggled to understand what this 'else' clause was doing and I assumed that 
it was
wrong. Searching through the ML I learned that this 'else' clause is intended 
to handle
legacy virtio devices that doesn't support the DMA API (introduced in 
8607f5c3072caeebb)
and thus shouldn't set  VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM.


My suggestion, if a v4 is required for any other reason, is to add a small 
comment in this
'else' clause explaining that this is the legacy virtio devices condition and 
those devices
don't set F_IOMMU_PLATFORM. This would make the code easier to read for a 
virtio casual like
myself.

I do not agree that this is about legacy virtio. In my understanding
virtio-ccw simply does not need translation because CCW devices use
guest physical addresses as per architecture. It may be considered
legacy stuff form PCI perspective, but I don't think it is legacy
in general.


I wasn't talking about virtio-ccw. I was talking about this piece of code:


    if (klass->get_dma_as != NULL && has_iommu) {
        virtio_add_feature(&vdev->host_features, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
        vdev->dma_as = klass->get_dma_as(qbus->parent);
    } else {
        vdev->dma_as = &address_space_memory;
    }


I suggested something like this:



    if (klass->get_dma_as != NULL && has_iommu) {
        virtio_add_feature(&vdev->host_features, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
        vdev->dma_as = klass->get_dma_as(qbus->parent);
    } else {
        /*
         * We don't force VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM for legacy devices, i.e.
         * devices that don't implement klass->get_dma_as, regardless of
         * 'has_iommu' setting.
         */
        vdev->dma_as = &address_space_memory;
    }


At least from my reading of commits 8607f5c3072 and 2943b53f682 this seems to be
the case. I spent some time thinking that this IF/ELSE was wrong because I 
wasn't
aware of this history.


Thanks,


Daniel






And there is a good reason for virtio-ccw devices to use
F_IOMMU_PLATFORM (secure execution).

Other opinions?

Regards,
Halil



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]