qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] 9p: darwin: Implement compatibility for mknodat


From: Christian Schoenebeck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] 9p: darwin: Implement compatibility for mknodat
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 15:21:26 +0100

On Montag, 7. Februar 2022 11:57:25 CET Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Greg Kurz (groug@kaod.org) wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 11:30:18 +0100
> > 
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
> > > On 7/2/22 09:47, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 6 Feb 2022 20:10:23 -0500
> > > > 
> > > > Will Cohen <wwcohen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> This patch set currently places it in 9p-util only because 9p is the
> > > >> only
> > > >> place where this issue seems to have come up so far and we were wary
> > > >> of
> > > >> editing files too far afield, but I have no attachment to its
> > > >> specific
> > > >> location!
> > > > 
> > > > Inline comments are preferred on qemu-devel. Please don't top post !
> > > > This complicates the review a lot.
> > > > 
> > > > This is indeed a good candidate for osdep. This being said, unless
> > > > there's
> > > > some other user in the QEMU code base, it is acceptable to leave it
> > > > under
> > > > 9pfs.
> > > 
> > > virtiofsd could eventually use it.
> > 
> > Indeed but virtiofsd is for linux hosts only AFAICT and I'm not aware of
> > any work to support any other host OS.
> > 
> > Cc'ing virtio-fs people for inputs on this topic.
> 
> Indeeed, there's a lot of Linux specific code in the virtiofsd - I know
> people are interested in other platforms, but I'm not sure that's the
> right starting point.
> 
> Dave

Agreeing with Greg here: i.e. I would have placed this into osdep, but I would 
not insist on it either.

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]