[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Startup" meeting (was Re: Meeting today?)
From: |
Juan Quintela |
Subject: |
Re: "Startup" meeting (was Re: Meeting today?) |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:35:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Mark Burton <mark.burton@greensocs.com> wrote:
> Hi Juan, is there a meeting today? I think the plan was to talk about
> ’startup’ itself ?
> Cheers
> Mark.
Hi Mark
Yeap. I asked for it on last meeting. The call for topics is on the
list (not that anyone else has answered)
Later, Juan.
>
>> On 25 Jan 2022, at 11:58, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>>> On 1/25/22 09:50, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>> Mark Burton <mark.burton@greensocs.com> wrote:
>>>>> All, I believe we will have a followup meeting this coming Tuesday
>>>>> 25th January, at 15:00 (presumably using the same link:
>>>>> https://redhat.bluejeans.com/5402697718).
>>>>>
>>>>> We (GreenSocs/Xilinx) would like to quickly show what now ‘works’, and to
>>>>> give an update on the patches.
>>>>
>>>> I send the call for agenda already.
>>>>
>>>> We are having the meeting.
>>>
>>> Do we need to stick to bluejeans, or can we switch to something more
>>> generic to easily record the call, and be able to start when Juan is
>>> not available?
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Anyone from inside Red Hat can start the call. So I think that starting
>> the call shouldn't be a problem.
>>
>> If I remember correctly, one of the reasons for using bluejeans was that
>> in the past we used to be around 40 people on the call, and that was not
>> easy to setup. Perhaps today it is different.
>>
>> About recording, I will ask everybody if they agree on the call and we
>> can record it. On the past we _didn't_ want recordings, but I can't
>> remember the reason.
>>
>> Later, Juan.
>>