[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/smbios: fix table memory corruption with large mem
From: |
Ani Sinha |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/smbios: fix table memory corruption with large memory vms |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:48:21 +0530 |
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 6:21 PM Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 17:01:28 +0530
> Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca> wrote:
>
> > With the current smbios table assignment code, we can have only 512 DIMM
> > slots
> it's a bit confusing, since it's not DIMM slots in QEMU sense (we do not
> expose
> DIMM devices via SMBIOS/E820). So maybe clarify here that initial RAM is split
> into 16GB (with 'DIMM' type ) chunks/entries when it's described in SMBIOS
> table 17.
>
> > (each DIMM of 16 GiB in size) before tables 17 and 19 conflict with their
> > addresses.
>
> Are you sure it's addresses that are wrong?
I don't know why I had this pre conception of memory corruption and
overlapping addresses! Even the BZ says table handles overlap. Grr ...
doing too much multiplexing these days :(