|
From: | Richard Henderson |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v4 24/47] target/ppc: move vrl[bhwd]nm/vrl[bhwd]mi to decodetree |
Date: | Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:30:20 -1000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 |
On 2/22/22 04:36, matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br wrote:
+static void gen_vrlnm_vec(unsigned vece, TCGv_vec vrt, TCGv_vec vra, + TCGv_vec vrb) +{ + TCGv_vec mask, n = tcg_temp_new_vec_matching(vrt); + + /* Create the mask */ + mask = do_vrl_mask_vec(vece, vrb); + + /* Extract n */ + tcg_gen_dupi_vec(vece, n, (8 << vece) - 1); + tcg_gen_and_vec(vece, n, vrb, n); + + /* Rotate and mask */ + tcg_gen_rotlv_vec(vece, vrt, vra, n);
Note that rotlv does the masking itself: /* * Expand D = A << (B % element bits) * * Unlike scalar shifts, where it is easy for the target front end * to include the modulo as part of the expansion. If the target * naturally includes the modulo as part of the operation, great! * If the target has some other behaviour from out-of-range shifts, * then it could not use this function anyway, and would need to * do it's own expansion with custom functions. */
+static bool do_vrlnm(DisasContext *ctx, arg_VX *a, int vece) +{ + static const TCGOpcode vecop_list[] = { + INDEX_op_cmp_vec, INDEX_op_rotlv_vec, INDEX_op_sari_vec, + INDEX_op_shli_vec, INDEX_op_shri_vec, INDEX_op_shrv_vec, 0 + };
Where is sari used? r~
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |