On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 04:16:27PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I just booted up a Windows VM, and it looks like Hyper-V uses
"Hyper_V_Gen_Counter_V1", which is also quite long, so we can't really
HID match on that either.
Yes, due to the same problem. I'd really prefer we sort out the ACPI
matching before this goes mainline. Matching on _HID is explicitly
discouraged in the VMGenID spec.
OK, this really sucks. Quoting the ACPI spec:
"""
A _HID object evaluates to either a numeric 32-bit compressed EISA
type ID or a string. If a string, the format must be an alphanumeric
PNP or ACPI ID with no asterisk or other leading characters.
A valid PNP ID must be of the form "AAA####" where A is an uppercase
letter and # is a hex digit.
A valid ACPI ID must be of the form "NNNN####" where N is an uppercase
letter or a digit ('0'-'9') and # is a hex digit. This specification
reserves the string "ACPI" for use only with devices defined herein.
It further reserves all strings representing 4 HEX digits for
exclusive use with PCI-assigned Vendor IDs.
"""
So now we have to implement Microsoft's fork of ACPI to be able to use
this device, even if we expose it from QEMU instead of Hyper-V? I
strongly object to that.
Instead, we can match on _HID exposed by QEMU, and cordially invite
Microsoft to align their spec with the ACPI spec.
I don't know about that... Seems a bit extreme. Hopefully Alex will be
able to sort something out with the ACPI people, and this driver will
work inside of Hyper-V.
Here's what we currently have:
static const struct acpi_device_id vmgenid_ids[] = {
{ "VMGENID", 0 }, <------------------------------------ ???
{ "QEMUVGID", 0 }, <------------------------------------ QEMU
{ },
};
Adrian added "VMGENID" in last year's v4, so I copied that for this new
driver here. But does anybody know which hypervisor it is for? Some
internal Amazon thing? Firecracker? VMware? In case Alex does not
succeed with the ACPI changes, it'd be nice to know which HIDs for
which hypervisors we do and do not support.