[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] tests/avocado: Cancel BootLinux tests in case there is no free p
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
[PATCH] tests/avocado: Cancel BootLinux tests in case there is no free port |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:43:25 +0100 |
The BootLinux tests are currently failing with an ugly python
stack trace on my RHEL8 system since they cannot get a free port
(likely due to the firewall settings on my system). Let's properly
check the return value of find_free_port() instead and cancel the
test gracefully if it cannot get a free port.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
Unfortunately, it still takes > 70 seconds for each and every
tests from tests/avocado/boot_linux.py to get canceled, so
tests/avocado/boot_linux.py still renders "make check-avocado"
for me pretty unusable... looking at the implementation of
find_free_port() in Avocado, I wonder whether there isn't a
better way to get a free port number in Python? Brute-forcing
all ports between 1024 and 65536 seems just quite cumbersome
to me...
tests/avocado/avocado_qemu/__init__.py | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/avocado/avocado_qemu/__init__.py
b/tests/avocado/avocado_qemu/__init__.py
index 75063c0c30..9b056b5ce5 100644
--- a/tests/avocado/avocado_qemu/__init__.py
+++ b/tests/avocado/avocado_qemu/__init__.py
@@ -603,6 +603,8 @@ def prepare_cloudinit(self, ssh_pubkey=None):
try:
cloudinit_iso = os.path.join(self.workdir, 'cloudinit.iso')
self.phone_home_port = network.find_free_port()
+ if not self.phone_home_port:
+ self.cancel('Failed to get a free port')
pubkey_content = None
if ssh_pubkey:
with open(ssh_pubkey) as pubkey:
--
2.27.0
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [PATCH] tests/avocado: Cancel BootLinux tests in case there is no free port,
Thomas Huth <=