qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PATCH v2 06/10] vdpa-dev: implement the unrealize interface


From: Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 06/10] vdpa-dev: implement the unrealize interface
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 07:11:47 +0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 7:36 PM
> To: Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
> <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> Cc: stefanha@redhat.com; mst@redhat.com; cohuck@redhat.com;
> pbonzini@redhat.com; Gonglei (Arei) <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>; Yechuan
> <yechuan@huawei.com>; Huangzhichao <huangzhichao@huawei.com>;
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] vdpa-dev: implement the unrealize interface
> 
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 08:43:27PM +0800, Longpeng(Mike) via wrote:
> >From: Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> >
> >Implements the .unrealize interface.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> >---
> > hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c b/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c
> >index bd28cf7a15..e5691d02bb 100644
> >--- a/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c
> >+++ b/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c
> >@@ -132,9 +132,31 @@ out:
> >     s->vdpa_dev_fd = -1;
> > }
> >
> >+static void vhost_vdpa_vdev_unrealize(VhostVdpaDevice *s)
> >+{
> >+    VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(s);
> >+    int i;
> >+
> >+    for (i = 0; i < s->num_queues; i++) {
> >+        virtio_delete_queue(s->virtqs[i]);
> >+    }
> >+    g_free(s->virtqs);
> >+    virtio_cleanup(vdev);
> >+
> >+    g_free(s->config);
> 
> Is there a particular reason for these steps in a separate function?
> 
> >+}
> >+
> > static void vhost_vdpa_device_unrealize(DeviceState *dev)
> > {
> >-    return;
> >+    VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(dev);
> >+    VhostVdpaDevice *s = VHOST_VDPA_DEVICE(vdev);
> >+
> >+    virtio_set_status(vdev, 0);
> >+    vhost_vdpa_vdev_unrealize(s);
> >+    g_free(s->dev.vqs);
> >+    vhost_dev_cleanup(&s->dev);
> >+    qemu_close(s->vdpa_dev_fd);
> >+    s->vdpa_dev_fd = -1;
> > }
> 
> Maybe we can have all steps (in the reverse order of
> vhost_vdpa_device_realize) in vhost_vdpa_device_unrealize().
> 

Make sense. Will do.

> Stefano




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]