Re: [PATCH 3/6] tests/9pfs: compare QIDs in fs_walk_none() test

[Greg Kurz]

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:39:56 +0100
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:

> On Freitag, 11. März 2022 17:11:24 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:04:50 +0100
> > 
> > Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> > > On Mittwoch, 9. März 2022 15:49:04 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > > Extend previously added fs_walk_none() test by comparing the QID
> > > > of the root fid with the QID of the cloned fid. They should be
> > > > equal.
> > 
> > Ha, I understand your suggestion of changing the name now :-) but I'll
> > personally leave it named according to the test scenario of "sending
> > a Twalk with no names" and checking everything that is expected in this
> > case.
> 
> NP
> 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > >  tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > > index 6c00da03f4..9098e21173 100644
> > > > --- a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > > +++ b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
> > > > @@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ static void v9fs_uint16_read(P9Req *req, uint16_t
> > > > *val) le16_to_cpus(val);
> > > > 
> > > >  }
> > > > 
> > > > +static void v9fs_int16_read(P9Req *req, int16_t *val)
> > > > +{
> > > > +    v9fs_uint16_read(req, (uint16_t *)val);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > 
> > > >  static void v9fs_uint32_write(P9Req *req, uint32_t val)
> > > >  {
> > > >  
> > > >      uint32_t le_val = cpu_to_le32(val);
> > > > 
> > > > @@ -166,12 +171,22 @@ static void v9fs_uint32_read(P9Req *req, uint32_t
> > > > *val) le32_to_cpus(val);
> > > > 
> > > >  }
> > > > 
> > > > +static void v9fs_int32_read(P9Req *req, int32_t *val)
> > > > +{
> > > > +    v9fs_uint32_read(req, (uint32_t *)val);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > 
> > > >  static void v9fs_uint64_read(P9Req *req, uint64_t *val)
> > > >  {
> > > >  
> > > >      v9fs_memread(req, val, 8);
> > > >      le64_to_cpus(val);
> > > >  
> > > >  }
> > > > 
> > > > +static void v9fs_int64_read(P9Req *req, int64_t *val)
> > > > +{
> > > > +    v9fs_uint64_read(req, (uint64_t *)val);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > 
> > > >  /* len[2] string[len] */
> > > >  static uint16_t v9fs_string_size(const char *string)
> > > >  {
> > > > 
> > > > @@ -425,6 +440,40 @@ static void v9fs_rwalk(P9Req *req, uint16_t *nwqid,
> > > > v9fs_qid **wqid) v9fs_req_free(req);
> > > > 
> > > >  }
> > > > 
> > > > +/* size[4] Tstat tag[2] fid[4] */
> > > > +static P9Req *v9fs_tstat(QVirtio9P *v9p, uint32_t fid, uint16_t tag)
> > 
> > Tstat/Rstat aren't part of 9p2000.L, you should use Tgetattr/Rgetattr
> > instead (see https://github.com/chaos/diod/blob/master/protocol.md).
> 
> Ah right, I forgot.
> 
> > > > +{
> > > > +    P9Req *req;
> > > > +
> > > > +    req = v9fs_req_init(v9p, 4, P9_TSTAT, tag);
> > > > +    v9fs_uint32_write(req, fid);
> > > > +    v9fs_req_send(req);
> > > > +    return req;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/* size[4] Rstat tag[2] stat[n] */
> > > > +static void v9fs_rstat(P9Req *req, struct V9fsStat *st)
> > > > +{
> > > > +    v9fs_req_recv(req, P9_RSTAT);
> > > > +
> > 
> > For the records, this is a stat[n], i.e. "n[2] followed by n bytes of
> > data forming the parameter", so you should read an uint16_t first.
> > 
> > > > +    v9fs_int16_read(req, &st->size);
> 
> Which I did here? --^
> 

>From the BUGS section of 
>https://ericvh.github.io/9p-rfc/rfc9p2000.html#anchor32 :

     BUGS
          To make the contents of a directory, such as returned by
          read(5), easy to parse, each directory entry begins with a
          size field.  For consistency, the entries in Twstat and
          Rstat messages also contain their size, which means the size
                                                                  ^^^^
          appears twice.  For example, the Rstat message is formatted
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
          as ``(4+1+2+2+n)[4] Rstat tag[2] n[2] (n-2)[2] type[2]
          dev[4]...,'' where n is the value returned by Styx->packdir.

I realized that when giving a try to convert a v9fs_qid to a V9fsQID on
top of this patch.

> > > > +    v9fs_int16_read(req, &st->type);
> > > > +    v9fs_int32_read(req, &st->dev);
> > > > +    v9fs_uint8_read(req, &st->qid.type);
> > > > +    v9fs_uint32_read(req, &st->qid.version);
> > > > +    v9fs_uint64_read(req, &st->qid.path);
> > > > +    v9fs_int32_read(req, &st->mode);
> > > > +    v9fs_int32_read(req, &st->mtime);
> > > > +    v9fs_int32_read(req, &st->atime);
> > > > +    v9fs_int64_read(req, &st->length);
> > > > +    v9fs_string_read(req, &st->name.size, &st->name.data);
> > > > +    v9fs_string_read(req, &st->uid.size, &st->uid.data);
> > > > +    v9fs_string_read(req, &st->gid.size, &st->gid.data);
> > > > +    v9fs_string_read(req, &st->muid.size, &st->muid.data);
> > > > +
> > > > +    v9fs_req_free(req);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > 
> > > >  /* size[4] Treaddir tag[2] fid[4] offset[8] count[4] */
> > > >  static P9Req *v9fs_treaddir(QVirtio9P *v9p, uint32_t fid, uint64_t
> > > >  offset,
> > > >  
> > > >                              uint32_t count, uint16_t tag)
> > > > 
> > > > @@ -1009,6 +1058,8 @@ static void fs_walk_none(void *obj, void *data,
> > > > QGuestAllocator *t_alloc) v9fs_qid root_qid;
> > > > 
> > > >      g_autofree v9fs_qid *wqid = NULL;
> > > >      P9Req *req;
> > > > 
> > > > +    struct V9fsStat st[2];
> > > > +    int i;
> > > > 
> > > >      do_version(v9p);
> > > >      req = v9fs_tattach(v9p, 0, getuid(), 0);
> > > > 
> > > > @@ -1021,6 +1072,25 @@ static void fs_walk_none(void *obj, void *data,
> > > > QGuestAllocator *t_alloc)
> > > > 
> > > >      /* special case: no QID is returned if nwname=0 was sent */
> > > >      g_assert(wqid == NULL);
> > > > 
> > > > +
> > > > +    req = v9fs_tstat(v9p, 0, 0);
> > > > +    v9fs_req_wait_for_reply(req, NULL);
> > > > +    v9fs_rstat(req, &st[0]);
> > > 
> > > Probably stat-ing the root fid (0) should happen before sending Twalk, to
> > > better counter the 1st fid (0) having become potentially mutated?
> > 
> > You already have the root qid from Rattach, no need to stat.
> 
> Yes, this was about easy comparison with qid.version in mind, i.e. ...
> 
> > 
> > > > +
> > > > +    req = v9fs_tstat(v9p, 1, 0);
> > > > +    v9fs_req_wait_for_reply(req, NULL);
> > > > +    v9fs_rstat(req, &st[1]);
> > > > +
> > > > +    /* don't compare QID version for checking for file ID equalness */
> > > > +    g_assert(st[0].qid.type == st[1].qid.type);
> > > > +    g_assert(st[0].qid.path == st[1].qid.path);
> > > 
> > > I could add a helper function is_same_qid() for this if desired.
> > 
> > Rgetattr provides a qid[13] like Rattach. Since we control everything,
> > the version bits won't change and I think is_same_qid() could be
> > something as simple as:
> > 
> > static inline bool is_same_qid(v9fs_qid qid1, v9fs_qid qid2)
> > {
> >     return memcmp(qid1, qid2, 13) == 0;
> > }
> 
> Yes I know, the version definitely won't change with the synth driver. But I 
> thought to add code so it could be used for 'local' driver tests as well in 
> future.
> 

FWIW, even when using local, only an external cause could do that, which
would mean that the test environment is compromised, no ?

You can also ignore version and just compare the first byte and the 8 last
ones.

> > > > +
> > > > +    for (i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
> > > > +        g_free(st[i].name.data);
> > > > +        g_free(st[i].uid.data);
> > > > +        g_free(st[i].gid.data);
> > > > +        g_free(st[i].muid.data);
> > > > +    }
> > > 
> > > I didn't find a more elegant way to do this cleanup.
> > 
> > You won't need that with Tgetattr.
> > 
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > >  static void fs_walk_dotdot(void *obj, void *data, QGuestAllocator
> > > >  *t_alloc)
> 
>