|
From: | Niek Linnenbank |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] memory: Make memory_region_readd_subregion() properly handle mapped aliases |
Date: | Mon, 21 Mar 2022 22:59:18 +0100 |
Hi Paolo,Thanks for queing this patch. I did not yet see it appear in master. Do you know when we can expect to see it?Regards,NiekOn Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 11:51 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:On 2/1/22 11:09, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> memory_region_readd_subregion() wants to readd a region by first
> removing it and then readding it. For readding, it doesn't use one of
> the memory_region_add_*() variants, which is why fail to re-increment the
> mr->mapped_via_alias counters, resulting in the
> assert(alias->mapped_via_alias >= 0) in memory_region_del_subregion()
> triggering the next time we call memory_region_readd_subregion().
>
> Fix it by using memory_region_add_subregion_common() for readding the
> region.
>
> Reported-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 5ead62185d23 ("memory: Make memory_region_is_mapped() succeed when mapped via an alias")
> Tested-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> softmmu/memory.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/memory.c b/softmmu/memory.c
> index 678dc62f06..76bb1677fe 100644
> --- a/softmmu/memory.c
> +++ b/softmmu/memory.c
> @@ -2626,8 +2626,7 @@ static void memory_region_readd_subregion(MemoryRegion *mr)
> memory_region_transaction_begin();
> memory_region_ref(mr);
> memory_region_del_subregion(container, mr);
> - mr->container = container;
> - memory_region_update_container_subregions(mr);
> + memory_region_add_subregion_common(container, mr->addr, mr);
> memory_region_unref(mr);
> memory_region_transaction_commit();
> }
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
--Niek Linnenbank
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |