qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hw/arm/virt: Fix CPU's default NUMA node ID


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hw/arm/virt: Fix CPU's default NUMA node ID
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:25:17 +0100

On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:24:36 +0800
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:

> When CPU-to-NUMA association isn't explicitly provided by users,
> the default on is given by mc->get_default_cpu_node_id(). However,
> the CPU topology isn't fully considered in the default association
> and this causes CPU topology broken warnings on booting Linux guest.
> 
> For example, the following warning messages are observed when the
> Linux guest is booted with the following command lines.
> 
>   /home/gavin/sandbox/qemu.main/build/qemu-system-aarch64 \
>   -accel kvm -machine virt,gic-version=host               \
>   -cpu host                                               \
>   -smp 6,sockets=2,cores=3,threads=1                      \
>   -m 1024M,slots=16,maxmem=64G                            \
>   -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=128M            \
>   -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=128M            \
>   -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem2,size=128M            \
>   -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem3,size=128M            \
>   -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem4,size=128M            \
>   -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem4,size=384M            \
>   -numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=mem0                         \
>   -numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=mem1                         \
>   -numa node,nodeid=2,memdev=mem2                         \
>   -numa node,nodeid=3,memdev=mem3                         \
>   -numa node,nodeid=4,memdev=mem4                         \
>   -numa node,nodeid=5,memdev=mem5
>          :
>   alternatives: patching kernel code
>   BUG: arch topology borken
>   the CLS domain not a subset of the MC domain
>   <the above error log repeats>
>   BUG: arch topology borken
>   the DIE domain not a subset of the NODE domain
> 
> With current implementation of mc->get_default_cpu_node_id(),
> CPU#0 to CPU#5 are associated with NODE#0 to NODE#5 separately.
> That's incorrect because CPU#0/1/2 should be associated with same
> NUMA node because they're seated in same socket.
> 
> This fixes the issue by considering the socket ID when the default
> CPU-to-NUMA association is provided in virt_possible_cpu_arch_ids().
> With this applied, no more CPU topology broken warnings are seen
> from the Linux guest. The 6 CPUs are associated with NODE#0/1, but
> there are no CPUs associated with NODE#2/3/4/5.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

> ---
>  hw/arm/virt.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index 064eac42f7..3286915229 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -2497,7 +2497,9 @@ virt_cpu_index_to_props(MachineState *ms, unsigned 
> cpu_index)
>  
>  static int64_t virt_get_default_cpu_node_id(const MachineState *ms, int idx)
>  {
> -    return idx % ms->numa_state->num_nodes;
> +    int64_t socket_id = ms->possible_cpus->cpus[idx].props.socket_id;
> +
> +    return socket_id % ms->numa_state->num_nodes;
>  }
>  
>  static const CPUArchIdList *virt_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]