qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: virt: Warn the user if -bios is provided


From: Ralf Ramsauer
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: virt: Warn the user if -bios is provided when using KVM
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 00:07:01 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0



On 31/03/2022 02:11, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 7:08 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 06:13:46PM +0100, Ralf Ramsauer wrote:
The -bios option is silently ignored if used in combination with -enable-kvm.
The reason is that the machine starts in S-Mode, and the bios typically runs in
M-Mode.

Warn the user that the bios won't be loaded.

Signed-off-by: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@oth-regensburg.de>
---
  hw/riscv/virt.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/riscv/virt.c b/hw/riscv/virt.c
index 4496a15346..a4d13114ee 100644
--- a/hw/riscv/virt.c
+++ b/hw/riscv/virt.c
@@ -1312,6 +1312,9 @@ static void virt_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
       * when KVM is enabled.
       */
      if (kvm_enabled()) {
+        if (machine->firmware && strcmp(machine->firmware, "none"))
+            warn_report("BIOS is not supported in combination with KVM. "
+                        "Ignoring BIOS.");

If the usage scenario isn't supportable, then ultimately we should be
raising an error and immediately exiting.

If you know of common usage that is already mistakenly passing -bios,
then we could start with a warning and list it as deprecated, then
change to an error_report 2 releases later. If we don't thing people
are often mistakenly passing -bios, then go straight for error_report
and exit.

That's a good point. The original thinking was that we did support
-bios and so we should warn the user that it's unlikely they want to
use it. This would still allow S mode UEFI loaders to be used (they
don't exist today).

Considering we are currently just ignoring the option I agree it's
better to report an error.

Do you mind sending a v2 Ralf?

Yes, will return with another revision. Anyway, I'll choose to exit immediately, as I doubt that there are any non-development users of this particular feature (RISCV/Qemu + KVM) due to the lack of physical hardware.

Thanks
  Ralf


Alistair


          g_free(machine->firmware);
          machine->firmware = g_strdup("none");
      }
--
2.32.0



With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]