Re: iotest40 problem

[John Snow]

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022, 10:53 AM Li Zhang <lizhang@suse.de> wrote:

On 3/31/22 16:46, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 10:37 AM John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com
> <mailto:jsnow@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 6:47 AM Li Zhang <lizhang@suse.de
>     <mailto:lizhang@suse.de>> wrote:
>
>         On 3/31/22 08:10, Hanna Reitz wrote:
>          > On 29.03.22 18:49, Li Zhang wrote:
>          >> Update what I observed.
>          >>
>          >> It seems that aqmp is not stable when running test cases.
>          >> So I revert the patches as the following, iotest40/41 test
>         cases work
>          >> well.
>          >
>          > Thanks for bisecting.  I haven’t seen this problem before, so
>         I didn’t
>          > look into it; CC-ing John, perhaps he figures something.
>          >
>         Thanks a lot.
>         It happens occassionally. I didn't find a way to reproduce it
>         manually.
>
>
>     Sorry for the instability.
>
>     A few questions then:
>
>     - what operating system and version
>     - kernel version
>     - architecture (looks like x86 and others?)
>     - what commit/version of QEMU are you testing?
>     - what python version are you using to run iotests?
>
>
> I'll also point out these patchsets, because we're in different
> timezones and if I'm lucky it will be the answer:
>
> [1] https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220201041134.1237016-1-jsnow@redhat.com/
> <https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220201041134.1237016-1-jsnow@redhat.com/>
>
> [2] https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220225205948.3693480-1-jsnow@redhat.com/
> <https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220225205948.3693480-1-jsnow@redhat.com/>

Thanks a lot.

I backport aqmp related patches, it looks good to run the cases
iotest040/041.

Excellent, thanks for reporting back!