[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] mm/shmem: Restrict MFD_INACCESSIBLE memory against
From: |
Sean Christopherson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] mm/shmem: Restrict MFD_INACCESSIBLE memory against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:05:36 +0000 |
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, Chao Peng wrote:
> Since page migration / swapping is not supported yet, MFD_INACCESSIBLE
> memory behave like longterm pinned pages and thus should be accounted to
> mm->pinned_vm and be restricted by RLIMIT_MEMLOCK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> mm/shmem.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 7b43e274c9a2..ae46fb96494b 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -915,14 +915,17 @@ static void notify_fallocate(struct inode *inode,
> pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
> static void notify_invalidate_page(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio,
> pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMFILE_NOTIFIER
> struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMFILE_NOTIFIER
> start = max(start, folio->index);
> end = min(end, folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio));
>
> memfile_notifier_invalidate(&info->memfile_notifiers, start, end);
> #endif
> +
> + if (info->xflags & SHM_F_INACCESSIBLE)
> + atomic64_sub(end - start, ¤t->mm->pinned_vm);
As Vishal's to-be-posted selftest discovered, this is broken as current->mm may
be NULL. Or it may be a completely different mm, e.g. AFAICT there's nothing
that
prevents a different process from punching hole in the shmem backing.
I don't see a sane way of tracking this in the backing store unless the inode is
associated with a single mm when it's created, and that opens up a giant can of
worms, e.g. what happens with the accounting if the creating process goes away?
I think the correct approach is to not do the locking automatically for
SHM_F_INACCESSIBLE,
and instead require userspace to do shmctl(.., SHM_LOCK, ...) if userspace
knows the
consumers don't support migrate/swap. That'd require wrapping migrate_page()
and then
wiring up notifier hooks for migrate/swap, but IMO that's a good thing to get
sorted
out sooner than later. KVM isn't planning on support migrate/swap for TDX or
SNP,
but supporting at least migrate for a software-only implementation a la pKVM
should
be relatively straightforward. On the notifiee side, KVM can terminate the VM
if it
gets an unexpected migrate/swap, e.g. so that TDX/SEV VMs don't die later with
exceptions and/or data corruption (pre-SNP SEV guests) in the guest.
Hmm, shmem_writepage() already handles SHM_F_INACCESSIBLE by rejecting the
swap, so
maybe it's just the page migration path that needs to be updated?
- Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] mm/shmem: Restrict MFD_INACCESSIBLE memory against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK,
Sean Christopherson <=
Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] mm/shmem: Restrict MFD_INACCESSIBLE memory against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, Chao Peng, 2022/04/08