[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] hw/cxl: Fix missing write mask for HDM decoder target lis
From: |
Jonathan Cameron |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] hw/cxl: Fix missing write mask for HDM decoder target list registers |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:37:02 +0100 |
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:19:28 -0700
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org> wrote:
> On 22-06-07 17:07:47, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > Without being able to write these registers, no interleaving is possible.
> > More refined checks of HDM register state on commit to follow.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > v3: Actually pass the parameter to the call...
> > v2: (Ben Widawsky)
> > - Correctly set a tighter write mask for the endpoint devices where this
> > register has a different use.
> >
> > hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c | 11 +++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > index 7985c9bfca..2208284ee6 100644
> > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > @@ -154,7 +154,8 @@ static void ras_init_common(uint32_t *reg_state,
> > uint32_t *write_msk)
> > reg_state[R_CXL_RAS_ERR_CAP_CTRL] = 0x00;
> > }
> >
> > -static void hdm_init_common(uint32_t *reg_state, uint32_t *write_msk)
> > +static void hdm_init_common(uint32_t *reg_state, uint32_t *write_msk,
> > + enum reg_type type)
> > {
> > int decoder_count = 1;
> > int i;
> > @@ -174,6 +175,12 @@ static void hdm_init_common(uint32_t *reg_state,
> > uint32_t *write_msk)
> > write_msk[R_CXL_HDM_DECODER0_SIZE_LO + i * 0x20] = 0xf0000000;
> > write_msk[R_CXL_HDM_DECODER0_SIZE_HI + i * 0x20] = 0xffffffff;
> > write_msk[R_CXL_HDM_DECODER0_CTRL + i * 0x20] = 0x13ff;
> > + if (type == CXL2_DEVICE) {
> > + write_msk[R_CXL_HDM_DECODER0_TARGET_LIST_LO + i * 0x20] =
> > 0xf0000000;
> > + } else {
> > + write_msk[R_CXL_HDM_DECODER0_TARGET_LIST_LO + i * 0x20] =
> > 0xffffffff;
> > + }
> > + write_msk[R_CXL_HDM_DECODER0_TARGET_LIST_HI + i * 0x20] =
> > 0xffffffff;
>
> Should it be (type == CXL2_DEVICE || type == CXL2_TYPE3_DEVICE) ?
Good point, but also for consistency I think we need
type == CXL2_LOGICAL_DEVICE as well.
We will only exercise the match to CXL2_TYPE3_DEVICE currently
as we don't have any emulation for MLDs (and hence LD) or type 1/2 devices
(CXL2_DEVICE).
I'll send a v4 out tomorrow.
>
> Otherwise,
> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
>
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -239,7 +246,7 @@ void cxl_component_register_init_common(uint32_t
> > *reg_state, uint32_t *write_msk
> > }
> >
> > init_cap_reg(HDM, 5, 1);
> > - hdm_init_common(reg_state, write_msk);
> > + hdm_init_common(reg_state, write_msk, type);
> >
> > if (caps < 5) {
> > return;
> > --
> > 2.32.0
> >