[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:56:16 +0200 |
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:40:13 +0200
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> wrote:
> Le 30/06/2022 à 14:23, Igor Mammedov a écrit :
> > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47 +0200
> > Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> wrote:
> >
> >> Allow -numa without initiator value when hmat=on so that we may
> >> build more complex topologies, e.g. NUMA nodes whose best initiators
> >> are not just another single node.
> >>
> > patches looks fine code-wise,
> > however something wrong with them, i.e. 'git am' doesn't like them
> > nor ./scripts/checkpatch (which one should use before sending patches).
> >
> > I've checked it's not my mail server/client issue(or whatever)
> > that corrupts them (ones downloaded from patchew are broken as well)
>
>
> I don't know what's going on. These 4 patches are in
> https://github.com/bgoglin/qemu/commits/hmat-noinitiator (rebased on
> master 10mn ago).
I'm not sure if we take patches from directly from git-forges,
I guess it's upto maintainers.
CCing Michael,
since these should go through his tree
>
> Do whatever you want with them. I am not allowed to spend more time on this.
>
> Brice
>
>
>
- [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa, Brice Goglin, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH v4 1/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa, Brice Goglin, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH v4 2/4] tests: acpi: add and whitelist *.hmat-noinitiator expected blobs, Brice Goglin, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH v4 3/4] tests: acpi: q35: add test for hmat nodes without initiators, Brice Goglin, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH v4 4/4] tests: acpi: q35: update expected blobs *.hmat-noinitiators, Brice Goglin, 2022/06/30
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa, Igor Mammedov, 2022/06/30