[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa
|
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:28:22 -0400 |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 09:40:19AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
...
>
> Before this patch, we had to add ",initiator=X" to "-numa
> node,nodeid=2,memdev=ram2".
> The lstopo output difference between initiator=1 and no initiator is:
> @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
> Machine (2966MB total) + Package P#0
> + NUMANode P#2 (979MB)
> Group0
> NUMANode P#0 (980MB)
> Core P#0 + PU P#0
> Core P#1 + PU P#1
> Group0
> NUMANode P#1 (1007MB)
> - NUMANode P#2 (979MB)
> Core P#2 + PU P#2
> Core P#3 + PU P#3
>
> Corresponding changes in the HMAT MPDA structure:
> @@ -49,10 +49,10 @@
> [078h 0120 2] Structure Type : 0000 [Memory Proximity Domain
> Attributes]
> [07Ah 0122 2] Reserved : 0000
> [07Ch 0124 4] Length : 00000028
> -[080h 0128 2] Flags (decoded below) : 0001
> - Processor Proximity Domain Valid : 1
> +[080h 0128 2] Flags (decoded below) : 0000
Including diff output like this is what is confusing
mail processing tools. Just escape the diff in the output
and this will make git happy. E.g.:
The lstopo output difference between initiator=1 and no initiator is:
| @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
| Machine (2966MB total) + Package P#0
| + NUMANode P#2 (979MB)
| Group0
| NUMANode P#0 (980MB)
| Core P#0 + PU P#0
| Core P#1 + PU P#1
| Group0
| NUMANode P#1 (1007MB)
| - NUMANode P#2 (979MB)
| Core P#2 + PU P#2
| Core P#3 + PU P#3
|
| Corresponding changes in the HMAT MPDA structure:
| @@ -49,10 +49,10 @@
| [078h 0120 2] Structure Type : 0000 [Memory Proximity Domain
Attributes]
| [07Ah 0122 2] Reserved : 0000
| [07Ch 0124 4] Length : 00000028
| -[080h 0128 2] Flags (decoded below) : 0001
| - Processor Proximity Domain Valid : 1
| +[080h 0128 2] Flags (decoded below) : 0000
--
MST
- [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa, Brice Goglin, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH v4 1/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa, Brice Goglin, 2022/06/30
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- [PATCH v4 2/4] tests: acpi: add and whitelist *.hmat-noinitiator expected blobs, Brice Goglin, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH v4 3/4] tests: acpi: q35: add test for hmat nodes without initiators, Brice Goglin, 2022/06/30
- [PATCH v4 4/4] tests: acpi: q35: update expected blobs *.hmat-noinitiators, Brice Goglin, 2022/06/30
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa, Igor Mammedov, 2022/06/30