qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH] target/ppc: fix unreachable code in do_ldst_quad()


From: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Subject: [PATCH] target/ppc: fix unreachable code in do_ldst_quad()
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:57:23 -0300

Coverity reports that commit fc34e81acd51 ("target/ppc: add macros to
check privilege level") turned the following code unreachable:

if (!prefixed && !(ctx->insns_flags2 & PPC2_LSQ_ISA207)) {
    /* lq and stq were privileged prior to V. 2.07 */
    REQUIRE_SV(ctx);

>>>     CID 1490757:  Control flow issues  (UNREACHABLE)
>>>     This code cannot be reached: "if (ctx->le_mode) {
    if (ctx->le_mode) {
        gen_align_no_le(ctx);
        return true;
    }
}

This happens because the macro REQUIRE_SV(), in CONFIG_USER_MODE, will
always result in a 'return true' statement.

Fix it by using "#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)" to fold the code that
shouldn't be there if we're running in a non-privileged state. This is
also how the REQUIRE_SV() macro is being used in
storage-ctrl-impl.c.inc.

Fixes: Coverity CID 1490757
Fixes: fc34e81acd51 ("target/ppc: add macros to check privilege level")
Cc: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
---
 target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc 
b/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc
index db14d3bebc..4a32fac4f3 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc
+++ b/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc
@@ -82,10 +82,14 @@ static bool do_ldst_quad(DisasContext *ctx, arg_D *a, bool 
store, bool prefixed)
         /* lq and stq were privileged prior to V. 2.07 */
         REQUIRE_SV(ctx);
 
+#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
         if (ctx->le_mode) {
             gen_align_no_le(ctx);
             return true;
         }
+#else
+    qemu_build_not_reached();
+#endif
     }
 
     if (!store && unlikely(a->ra == a->rt)) {
-- 
2.36.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]