[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Aug 2022 15:15:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.6 (2022-06-05) |
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 10:07:44AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 02:17:23PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hey Paolo,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:47:27PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > Hi Paolo,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > > On 8/5/22 01:04, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > > > + /* Nothing else uses this part of the hardware mapped region */
> > > > > + setup_data_base = 0xfffff - 0x1000;
> > > >
> > > > Isn't this where the BIOS lives? I don't think this works.
> > >
> > > That's the segment dedicated to ROM and hardware mapped addresses. So
> > > that's a place to put ROM material. No actual software will use it.
> > >
> > > Jason
> >
> > Unless I've misread the thread, I don't think there are any remaining
> > objections, right? Can we try merging this and seeing if it fixes the
> > issue for good?
> >
> > Jason
>
> Laszlo commented here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/fa0601e4-acf5-0ce8-9277-4d90d046b53e%40redhat.com
It is 7.1.0 rc2 date today, which leaves ideally only one rc remaining
before GA release.
The discussion still taking place in this thread does not fill me with
confidence that we're going to have a *well tested* solution before GA.
Even if we agree on a patch, are we really going to have confidence
in it being reliable if we've only got a week of testing ?
IMHO we're at the point where we should just disable the RNG feature
for 7.1.0, and gives ourselves time to come up with a solution in 7.2.0
that can be properly tested without the time pressure of release deadlines.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Paolo Bonzini, 2022/08/05
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Ard Biesheuvel, 2022/08/05
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Paolo Bonzini, 2022/08/05
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Ard Biesheuvel, 2022/08/05
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2022/08/09
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Paolo Bonzini, 2022/08/09
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Jason A. Donenfeld, 2022/08/05
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Laszlo Ersek, 2022/08/05
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Jason A. Donenfeld, 2022/08/09
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2022/08/09
- Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory,
Daniel P . Berrangé <=
- Re: [PATCH v2] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Laszlo Ersek, 2022/08/05
- Re: [PATCH v2] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Gerd Hoffmann, 2022/08/16
- Re: [PATCH v2] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Jason A. Donenfeld, 2022/08/18
- Re: [PATCH v2] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Gerd Hoffmann, 2022/08/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Ard Biesheuvel, 2022/08/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2022/08/04
- Re: [PATCH v2] hw/i386: place setup_data at fixed place in memory, Jason A. Donenfeld, 2022/08/04