Re: [PATCH RFC] hw/cxl: type 3 devices can now present volatile or persistent memory

[Davidlohr Bueso]

On Mon, 10 Oct 2022, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> I wonder if we care to emulate beyond 1 volatile and 1 persistent.
> Sure devices might exist, but if we can exercise all the code paths
> with a simpler configuration, perhaps we don't need to handle the
> more complex ones?

Yes, I completely agree. 1 of each seems like the best balance between
exercising code paths vs complexity.

Thanks,
Davidlohr