[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] vdagent: fix memory leak when vdagent_disconnect is
From: |
Marc-André Lureau |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] vdagent: fix memory leak when vdagent_disconnect is called |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jan 2023 15:29:15 +0400 |
Hi
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 6:48 PM <dengpc12@chinatelecom.cn> wrote:
>
> From: "dengpc12@chinatelecom.cn" <dengpc12@chinatelecom.cn>
>
> Memory free should be done in vdagent_disconnect using
> qemu_input_handler_unregister, replace qemu_input_handler_deactivate
> with that.
>
> Signed-off-by: dengpc12@chinatelecom.cn <dengpc12@chinatelecom.cn>
> Signed-off-by: liuym16@chinatelecom.cn <liuym16@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> ui/vdagent.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/ui/vdagent.c b/ui/vdagent.c
> index 4bf50f0c4d..645383b4ec 100644
> --- a/ui/vdagent.c
> +++ b/ui/vdagent.c
> @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ static void vdagent_disconnect(VDAgentChardev *vd)
> vdagent_reset_bufs(vd);
> vd->caps = 0;
> if (vd->mouse_hs) {
> - qemu_input_handler_deactivate(vd->mouse_hs);
> + qemu_input_handler_unregister(vd->mouse_hs);
It looks like vdagent_disconnect() was meant to be called when the
agent connection is lost, vdagent_chr_set_fe_open(fe_open=false), so
it can later be initialized again during vdagent_chr_recv_caps(). Not
sure why this isn't done.
Imho, you should instead add qemu_input_handler_unregister() call to
vdagent_chr_fini() for now
--
Marc-André Lureau
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] vdagent: fix memory leak when vdagent_disconnect is called,
Marc-André Lureau <=