Re: [PATCH 0/6] Resolve TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE

[Chuck Zmudzinski]

On 1/3/2023 8:38 AM, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:17 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> 
> wrote:
>
>     Hi Chuck,
>
>     On 3/1/23 04:15, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>     > On 1/2/23 4:34 PM, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
>     >> This series first renders TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE redundant and finally 
> removes
>     >> it. The motivation is to 1/ decouple PIIX from Xen and 2/ to make Xen 
> in the PC
>     >> machine agnostic to the precise southbridge being used. 2/ will become
>     >> particularily interesting once PIIX4 becomes usable in the PC machine, 
> avoiding
>     >> the "Frankenstein" use of PIIX4_ACPI in PIIX3.
>     >>
>     >> Testing done:
>     >> None, because I don't know how to conduct this properly :(
>     >>
>     >> Based-on: <20221221170003.2929-1-shentey@gmail.com>
>     >>            "[PATCH v4 00/30] Consolidate PIIX south bridges"
>
>     This series is based on a previous series:
>     
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20221221170003.2929-1-shentey@gmail.com/
>     (which itself also is).
>
>     >> Bernhard Beschow (6):
>     >>    include/hw/xen/xen: Make xen_piix3_set_irq() generic and rename it
>     >>    hw/isa/piix: Reuse piix3_realize() in piix3_xen_realize()
>     >>    hw/isa/piix: Wire up Xen PCI IRQ handling outside of PIIX3
>     >>    hw/isa/piix: Avoid Xen-specific variant of piix_write_config()
>     >>    hw/isa/piix: Resolve redundant k->config_write assignments
>     >>    hw/isa/piix: Resolve redundant TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE
>     >>
>     >>   hw/i386/pc_piix.c             | 34 ++++++++++++++++--
>     >>   hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c         |  9 +++--
>     >>   hw/isa/piix.c                 | 66 
> +----------------------------------
>     >
>     > This file does not exist on the Qemu master branch.
>     > But hw/isa/piix3.c and hw/isa/piix4.c do exist.
>     >
>     > I tried renaming it from piix.c to piix3.c in the patch, but
>     > the patch set still does not apply cleanly on my tree.
>     >
>     > Is this patch set re-based against something other than
>     > the current master Qemu branch?
>     >
>     > I have a system that is suitable for testing this patch set, but
>     > I need guidance on how to apply it to the Qemu source tree.
>
>     You can ask Bernhard to publish a branch with the full work,
>
>
> Hi Chuck,
>
> ... or just visit 
> 20230102213504.14646-1-shentey@gmail.com/">https://patchew.org/QEMU/20230102213504.14646-1-shentey@gmail.com/ . There 
> you'll find a git tag with a complete history and all instructions!
>
> Thanks for giving my series a test ride!
>
> Best regards,
> Bernhard
>
>     or apply each series locally. I use the b4 tool for that:
>     https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/installing.html
>
>     i.e.:
>
>     $ git checkout -b shentey_work
>     $ b4 am 20221120150550.63059-1-shentey@gmail.com
>     $ git am
>     ./v2_20221120_shentey_decouple_intx_to_lnkx_routing_from_south_bridges.mbx
>     $ b4 am 20221221170003.2929-1-shentey@gmail.com
>     $ git am
>     
> ./v4_20221221_shentey_this_series_consolidates_the_implementations_of_the_piix3_and_piix4_south.mbx
>     $ b4 am 20230102213504.14646-1-shentey@gmail.com
>     $ git am ./20230102_shentey_resolve_type_piix3_xen_device.mbx
>
>     Now the branch 'shentey_work' contains all the patches and you can test.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Phil.
>

OK, I didn't see the "Consolidate PIIX south bridges" series is a
prerequisite.

I will try it - it may take a couple of days because I need to test both
patch series in my environment and I can only work on this in my spare
time.

I will provide Tested-by tags to both series if successful. Otherwise,
I will reply with an explanation of any problems.

Chuck