Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] hw/isa/piix: Resolve redundant TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE

[Chuck Zmudzinski]

On 1/4/23 5:35 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 4/1/23 17:42, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>> On 1/4/23 9:44 AM, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
>>> During the last patches, TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE turned into a clone of
>>> TYPE_PIIX3_DEVICE. Remove this redundancy.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>   hw/i386/pc_piix.c             |  4 +---
>>>   hw/isa/piix.c                 | 20 --------------------
>>>   include/hw/southbridge/piix.h |  1 -
>>>   3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>>> index 5738d9cdca..6b8de3d59d 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>>> @@ -235,8 +235,6 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
>>>       if (pcmc->pci_enabled) {
>>>           DeviceState *dev;
>>>           PCIDevice *pci_dev;
>>> -        const char *type = xen_enabled() ? TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE
>>> -                                         : TYPE_PIIX3_DEVICE;
>>>           int i;
>>>   
>>>           pci_bus = i440fx_init(pci_type,
>>> @@ -250,7 +248,7 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
>>>                                          : pci_slot_get_pirq);
>>>           pcms->bus = pci_bus;
>>>   
>>> -        pci_dev = pci_new_multifunction(-1, true, type);
>>> +        pci_dev = pci_new_multifunction(-1, true, TYPE_PIIX3_DEVICE);
>>>           object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(pci_dev), "has-usb",
>>>                                    machine_usb(machine), &error_abort);
>>>           object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(pci_dev), "has-acpi",
>>> diff --git a/hw/isa/piix.c b/hw/isa/piix.c
>>> index 98e9b12661..e4587352c9 100644
>>> --- a/hw/isa/piix.c
>>> +++ b/hw/isa/piix.c
>>> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
>>>   #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>>>   #include "hw/ide/piix.h"
>>>   #include "hw/isa/isa.h"
>>> -#include "hw/xen/xen.h"
>>>   #include "sysemu/runstate.h"
>>>   #include "migration/vmstate.h"
>>>   #include "hw/acpi/acpi_aml_interface.h"
>>> @@ -465,24 +464,6 @@ static const TypeInfo piix3_info = {
>>>       .class_init    = piix3_class_init,
>>>   };
>>>   
>>> -static void piix3_xen_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>>> -{
>>> -    DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>>> -    PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>>> -
>>> -    k->realize = piix3_realize;
>>> -    /* 82371SB PIIX3 PCI-to-ISA bridge (Step A1) */
>>> -    k->device_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82371SB_0;
>>> -    dc->vmsd = &vmstate_piix3;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static const TypeInfo piix3_xen_info = {
>>> -    .name          = TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE,
>>> -    .parent        = TYPE_PIIX_PCI_DEVICE,
>>> -    .instance_init = piix3_init,
>>> -    .class_init    = piix3_xen_class_init,
>>> -};
>>> -
>>>   static void piix4_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
>>>   {
>>>       ERRP_GUARD();
>>> @@ -534,7 +515,6 @@ static void piix3_register_types(void)
>>>   {
>>>       type_register_static(&piix_pci_type_info);
>>>       type_register_static(&piix3_info);
>>> -    type_register_static(&piix3_xen_info);
>>>       type_register_static(&piix4_info);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/southbridge/piix.h b/include/hw/southbridge/piix.h
>>> index 65ad8569da..b1fc94a742 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/southbridge/piix.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/southbridge/piix.h
>>> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ struct PIIXState {
>>>   OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(PIIXState, PIIX_PCI_DEVICE)
>>>   
>>>   #define TYPE_PIIX3_DEVICE "PIIX3"
>>> -#define TYPE_PIIX3_XEN_DEVICE "PIIX3-xen"
>>>   #define TYPE_PIIX4_PCI_DEVICE "piix4-isa"
>>>   
>>>   #endif
>> 
>> 
>> This fixes the regression with the emulated usb tablet device that I 
>> reported in v1 here:
>> 
>> aed4f2c1-83f7-163a-fb44-f284376668dc@aol.com/">https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/aed4f2c1-83f7-163a-fb44-f284376668dc@aol.com/
>> 
>> I tested this patch again with all the prerequisites and now with v2 there 
>> are no regressions.
>> 
>> Tested-by: Chuck Zmudzinski <brchuckz@aol.com>
> 
> (IIUC Chuck meant to send this tag to the cover letter)
> 

Yes, I tested the whole patch series, not just this individual patch.
I tagged this one because it is the last patch in the series.