qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: intermittent hang, s390x host, bios-tables-test test, TPM


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: intermittent hang, s390x host, bios-tables-test test, TPM
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 19:25:24 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/2.2.9 (2022-11-12)

On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 03:39:31PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 15:16, Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/6/23 07:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > I'm seeing an intermittent hang on the s390 CI runner in the
> > > bios-tables-test test. It looks like we've deadlocked because:
> > >
> > >   * the TPM device is waiting for data on its socket that never arrives,
> > >     and it's holding the iothread lock
> > >   * QEMU is therefore not making forward progress;
> > >     in particular it is unable to handle qtest queries/responses
> > >   * the test binary thread 1 is waiting to get a response to its
> > >     qtest command, which is not going to arrive
> > >   * test binary thread 3 (tpm_emu_ctrl_thread) is has hit an
> > >     assertion and is trying to kill QEMU via qtest_kill_qemu()
> > >   * qtest_kill_qemu() is only a "SIGTERM and wait", so will wait
> > >     forever, because QEMU won't respond to the SIGTERM while it's
> > >     blocked waiting for the TPM device to release the iothread lock
> > >   * because the ctrl-thread is waiting for QEMU to exit, it's never
> > >     going to send the data that would unblock the TPM device emulation
> > >
> > [...]
> >
> > >
> > > Thread 3 (Thread 0x3ff8dafe900 (LWP 2661316)):
> > > #0  0x000003ff8e9c6002 in __GI___wait4 (pid=<optimized out>,
> > > stat_loc=stat_loc@entry=0x2aa0b42c9bc, options=<optimized out>,
> > > usage=usage@entry=0x0) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wait4.c:27
> > > #1  0x000003ff8e9c5f72 in __GI___waitpid (pid=<optimized out>,
> > > stat_loc=stat_loc@entry=0x2aa0b42c9bc, options=options@entry=0) at
> > > waitpid.c:38
> > > #2  0x000002aa0952a516 in qtest_wait_qemu (s=0x2aa0b42c9b0) at
> > > ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:206
> > > #3  0x000002aa0952a58a in qtest_kill_qemu (s=0x2aa0b42c9b0) at
> > > ../tests/qtest/libqtest.c:229
> > > #4  0x000003ff8f0c288e in g_hook_list_invoke () from
> > > /lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
> > > #5  <signal handler called>
> > > #6  __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
> > > #7  0x000003ff8e9240a2 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
> > > #8  0x000003ff8f0feda8 in g_assertion_message () from
> > > /lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
> > > #9  0x000003ff8f0fedfe in g_assertion_message_expr () from
> > > /lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
> > > #10 0x000002aa09522904 in tpm_emu_ctrl_thread (data=0x3fff5ffa160) at
> > > ../tests/qtest/tpm-emu.c:189
> >
> > This here seems to be the root cause. An unknown control channel command
> > was received from the TPM emulator backend by the control channel thread
> > and we end up in g_assert_not_reached().
> 
> Yeah. It would be good if we didn't deadlock without printing
> the assertion, though...
> 
> I guess we could improve qtest_kill_qemu() so it doesn't wait
> indefinitely for QEMU to exit but instead sends a SIGKILL 20
> seconds after the SIGTERM. (Annoyingly, there is no convenient
> "waitpid but with a timeout" function...)

We don't need to touch that. Instead the tpm-emu.c file needs to
call  qtest_add_abrt_handler() passing a callback that will invoke
qio_channel_close on its end of the socket. This will cause the
QEMU process to get EOF on the other end of the socket. It then
won't be stuck holding the iothread lock, and will be able to
respond to SIGTERM.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]