qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] read kvmclock from guest memory if !correct_tsc_shift


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] read kvmclock from guest memory if !correct_tsc_shift
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:54:03 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1

On 1/20/23 02:11, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Before kernel commit 78db6a5037965429c04d708281f35a6e5562d31b,
kvm_guest_time_update() would use vcpu->virtual_tsc_khz to calculate
tsc_shift value in the vcpus pvclock structure written to guest memory.

To clarify, the problem is that kvm_guest_time_update() uses the guest
TSC frequency *that userspace desired* instead of the *actual* TSC frequency. Because, within the 250 ppm tolerance, TSC scaling is not enabled, the guest kvmclock is incorrect; KVM_GET_CLOCK instead returns the correct value, and the bug occurs when migrating from a host that is publishing a buggy kvmclock to the guest.

For those kernels, if vcpu->virtual_tsc_khz != tsc_khz (which can be the
case when guest state is restored via migration, or if tsc-khz option is
passed to QEMU), and TSC scaling is not enabled (which happens if the
difference between the frequency requested via KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ and the
host TSC KHZ is smaller than 250ppm), then there can be a difference
between what KVM_GET_CLOCK would return and what the guest reads as
kvmclock value.

In practice, to trigger the bug you need to do two migrations from a six-year-old kernel; I just can't see too many people stumbling upon this in the wild, and I don't think it makes sense to hobble _all_ migrations from a kernel that is less than six years old for such an edge case. New versions of QEMU do not even support running with such old kernels (it will for example complain about no support for certain KVM PV features).

It is not a huge request for the user to know if they are in the problematic case. It is easiest to use a custom QEMU on the destination, and always compute the kvmclock value from memory if the page is valid.

Once you do a migration to the custom QEMU + a fixed kernel, the bug is gone for good and there is no need to introduce new user API for that.

Paolo

The effect is that the guest sees a jump in kvmclock value
(either forwards or backwards) in such case.

To fix incoming migration from pre-78db6a5037965 hosts,
read kvmclock value from guest memory.

Unless the KVM_CLOCK_CORRECT_TSC_SHIFT bit indicates
that the value retrieved by KVM_GET_CLOCK on the source
is safe to be used.







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]