Re: [PATCH 2/7] hw/acpi/ich9: Remove unneeded assignments

[Bernhard Beschow]

Am 24. Januar 2023 16:55:37 UTC schrieb Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>:
>On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 18:07:19 +0100
>Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The first thing ich9_pm_iospace_update() does is to set pm->pm_io_base to
>> the pm_io_base parameter.
>try to explain why 'pm->pm_io_base = 0' was there , what's changed 
>and then why it's no longer needed.

Meanwhile I think the whole function is a no-op and can be removed. Some 
archeology will explain how it came to be.

>
>> The pm_io_base parameter's value is the old
>> one of pm->pm_io_base.
>I can't parse this sentence.
>
>
>fixes: cacaab8bdd7460
>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/acpi/ich9.c | 4 +---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/hw/acpi/ich9.c b/hw/acpi/ich9.c
>> index 2050af67b9..0313e71e74 100644
>> --- a/hw/acpi/ich9.c
>> +++ b/hw/acpi/ich9.c
>> @@ -136,9 +136,7 @@ void ich9_pm_iospace_update(ICH9LPCPMRegs *pm, uint32_t 
>> pm_io_base)
>>  static int ich9_pm_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
>>  {
>>      ICH9LPCPMRegs *pm = opaque;
>> -    uint32_t pm_io_base = pm->pm_io_base;
>> -    pm->pm_io_base = 0;
>> -    ich9_pm_iospace_update(pm, pm_io_base);
>> +    ich9_pm_iospace_update(pm, pm->pm_io_base);
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>