|
From: | Richard Henderson |
Subject: | Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit host systems |
Date: | Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:33:36 -1000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 |
On 1/30/23 13:14, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 30/1/23 20:19, Richard Henderson wrote:But I do question whether we need to support 64-bit guests on 32-bit hosts at all.Retaining 32-bit on 32-bit allows arm32 to emulate i686, which I suspect, but have no proof, is the limit of what users actually want.I presume you implicitly restrict that to user emulation, right?
No, there's no specific reason to eliminate e.g. qemu-system-i386. or any other 32-bit guest. Though quite often such hardware doesn't really have enough ram to do a good job, that's not a technical argument against.
WRT i686, if your example is "i686 useremu on non-x86 embedde router" then any 32-bit host is potentially interested, not only arm32.
arm32 was merely an example -- the other 32-bit hosts are i686, mips, ppc. But we don't have many of them.
I remember being able to run armhf binaries on armel hosts (and vice versa) was useful 7 years ago.
Fair enough.
Today I have no clue, we could poll the community and some distributions.
Sure. r~
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |