Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] target/riscv: check smstateen fcsr flag

[Richard Henderson]

On 4/10/23 07:13, Mayuresh Chitale wrote:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +#define smstateen_fcsr_check(ctx) do { \
> +    if (!ctx->smstateen_fcsr_ok) { \
> +        if (ctx->virt_enabled) { \
> +            generate_exception(ctx, RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT); \
> +        } else { \
> +            generate_exception(ctx, RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST); \
> +        } \
> +        return true; \
> +    } \
> +} while (0)
> +#else
> +#define smstateen_fcsr_check(ctx)
> +#endif
> +
> +#define REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F(ctx) do { \
> +    if (!has_ext(ctx, RVF)) { \
> +        if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \
> +            return false; \
> +        } \
> +        smstateen_fcsr_check(ctx); \
>       } \
>   } while (0)

As a matter of style, I strongly object to a *nested* macro returning from the calling 
function.  These should all be changed to normal functions of the form

    if (!require_xyz(ctx) || !require_abc(ctx)) {
        return something;
    }

etc.  insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc is much much cleaner in this respect.


r~