[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 4/5] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag wi
|
From: |
Juan Quintela |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 4/5] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag without RDMA |
|
Date: |
Fri, 05 May 2023 00:53:39 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> In $SUBJECT s/recive/receive/
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 01:44:42PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> This could only happen if the source send
>
> s/send/sent/
Fixed.
>> RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK (i.e. rdma) and destination don't have CONFIG_RDMA.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> migration/qemu-file.c | 8 --------
>> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Thanks.
- [PATCH 0/5] Migration RDMA cleanup, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 1/5] migration: Make RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK a normal case entry, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 3/5] migration/rdma: We can calculate the rioc from the QEMUFile, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 4/5] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag without RDMA, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 2/5] migration/rdma: simplify ram_control_load_hook(), Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 5/5] migration/rdma: Check for postcopy sooner, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04