[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL 1/3] vfio/pci: add support for VF token
|
From: |
Matthew Rosato |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PULL 1/3] vfio/pci: add support for VF token |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 May 2023 12:51:04 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 |
On 5/9/23 5:59 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@samsung.com>
>
> VF token was introduced [1] to kernel vfio-pci along with SR-IOV
> support [2]. This patch adds support VF token among PF and VF(s). To
> passthu PCIe VF to a VM, kernel >= v5.7 needs this.
>
> It can be configured with UUID like:
>
> -device vfio-pci,host=DDDD:BB:DD:F,vf-token=<uuid>,...
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/158396393244.5601.10297430724964025753.stgit@gimli.home/
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/158396044753.5601.14804870681174789709.stgit@gimli.home/
>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230320073522epcms2p48f682ecdb73e0ae1a4850ad0712fd780@epcms2p4
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Hi Minwoo, Alex,
I'm seeing a regression in vfio-pci on s390 and bisect points to this commit.
I don't believe it's specific to s390 though, but rather when not using this
new vf-token, see below...
> ---
> hw/vfio/pci.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> hw/vfio/pci.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index ec9a854361ac..cf27f28936cb 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -2856,6 +2856,8 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp)
> int groupid;
> int i, ret;
> bool is_mdev;
> + char uuid[UUID_FMT_LEN];
> + char *name;
>
> if (!vbasedev->sysfsdev) {
> if (!(~vdev->host.domain || ~vdev->host.bus ||
> @@ -2936,7 +2938,15 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp)
> goto error;
> }
>
> - ret = vfio_get_device(group, vbasedev->name, vbasedev, errp);
> + if (!qemu_uuid_is_null(&vdev->vf_token)) {
> + qemu_uuid_unparse(&vdev->vf_token, uuid);
> + name = g_strdup_printf("%s vf_token=%s", vbasedev->name, uuid);
> + } else {
> + name = vbasedev->name;
^ here we copy the pointer when a vf-token was not specified.
> + }
> +
> + ret = vfio_get_device(group, name, vbasedev, errp);
> + g_free(name);
^ and then free it regardless. But I don't think we meant to free what
vbasedev->name points to, this was meant to free a duplicate string. I'm
subsequently seeing qemu crashes later on e.g. during device unplug.
I think doing a strdup in either case would fix the issue OR skipping the
g_free when qemu_uuid_is_null(&vdev->vf_token).
FWIW, I tried the following and it resolved the issue for me:
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
index bf27a39905..73874a94de 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
@@ -2994,7 +2994,7 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp)
qemu_uuid_unparse(&vdev->vf_token, uuid);
name = g_strdup_printf("%s vf_token=%s", vbasedev->name, uuid);
} else {
- name = vbasedev->name;
+ name = g_strdup(vbasedev->name);
}
ret = vfio_get_device(group, name, vbasedev, errp);