[RFC PATCH 2/5] HACK: target/arm/tcg: Add some more caches to cpu=max

[Jonathan Cameron]

Used to drive the MPAM cache intialization and to exercise more
of the PPTT cache entry generation code. Perhaps a default
L3 cache is acceptable for max?

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
 target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
index 8019f00bc3..2af67739f6 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
@@ -711,6 +711,17 @@ void aarch64_max_tcg_initfn(Object *obj)
     uint64_t t;
     uint32_t u;
 
+    /*
+     * Expanded cache set
+     */
+    cpu->clidr = 0x8204923; /* 4 4 4 4 3 in 3 bit fields */
+    cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x000000ff0000001aull; /* 64KB L1 dcache */
+    cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x000000ff0000001aull; /* 64KB L1 icache */
+    cpu->ccsidr[2] = 0x000007ff0000003aull; /* 1MB L2 unified cache */
+    cpu->ccsidr[4] = 0x000007ff0000007cull; /* 2MB L3 cache 128B line */
+    cpu->ccsidr[6] = 0x00007fff0000007cull; /* 16MB L4 cache 128B line */
+    cpu->ccsidr[8] = 0x0007ffff0000007cull; /* 2048MB L5 cache 128B line */
+
     /*
      * Reset MIDR so the guest doesn't mistake our 'max' CPU type for a real
      * one and try to apply errata workarounds or use impdef features we
@@ -828,6 +839,7 @@ void aarch64_max_tcg_initfn(Object *obj)
     t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64MMFR2, BBM, 2);      /* FEAT_BBM at level 2 */
     t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64MMFR2, EVT, 2);      /* FEAT_EVT */
     t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64MMFR2, E0PD, 1);     /* FEAT_E0PD */
+    t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64MMFR2, CCIDX, 1);      /* FEAT_TTCNP */
     cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr2 = t;
 
     t = cpu->isar.id_aa64zfr0;
-- 
2.39.2