[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 6/7] vhost-user: allow "vhost_set_vring" to wait for a reply
From: |
Laszlo Ersek |
Subject: |
[PATCH 6/7] vhost-user: allow "vhost_set_vring" to wait for a reply |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Aug 2023 20:29:36 +0200 |
The "vhost_set_vring" function already centralizes the common parts of
"vhost_user_set_vring_num", "vhost_user_set_vring_base" and
"vhost_user_set_vring_enable". We'll want to allow some of those callers
to wait for a reply.
Therefore, rebase "vhost_set_vring" from just "vhost_user_write" to
"vhost_user_write_msg", exposing the "wait_for_reply" parameter.
This is purely refactoring -- there is no observable change. That's
because:
- all three callers pass in "false" for "wait_for_reply", which disables
all logic in "vhost_user_write_msg" except the call to
"vhost_user_write";
- the fds=NULL and fd_num=0 arguments of the original "vhost_user_write"
call inside "vhost_set_vring" are hard-coded within
"vhost_user_write_msg".
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> (supporter:vhost)
Cc: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
Cc: German Maglione <gmaglione@redhat.com>
Cc: Liu Jiang <gerry@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Sergio Lopez Pascual <slp@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
---
hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
index cadafebd0767..beb4b832245e 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
@@ -1170,7 +1170,8 @@ static int vhost_user_write_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
VhostUserMsg *msg,
static int vhost_set_vring(struct vhost_dev *dev,
unsigned long int request,
- struct vhost_vring_state *ring)
+ struct vhost_vring_state *ring,
+ bool wait_for_reply)
{
VhostUserMsg msg = {
.hdr.request = request,
@@ -1179,13 +1180,13 @@ static int vhost_set_vring(struct vhost_dev *dev,
.hdr.size = sizeof(msg.payload.state),
};
- return vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0);
+ return vhost_user_write_msg(dev, &msg, wait_for_reply);
}
static int vhost_user_set_vring_num(struct vhost_dev *dev,
struct vhost_vring_state *ring)
{
- return vhost_set_vring(dev, VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_NUM, ring);
+ return vhost_set_vring(dev, VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_NUM, ring, false);
}
static void vhost_user_host_notifier_free(VhostUserHostNotifier *n)
@@ -1216,7 +1217,7 @@ static void
vhost_user_host_notifier_remove(VhostUserHostNotifier *n,
static int vhost_user_set_vring_base(struct vhost_dev *dev,
struct vhost_vring_state *ring)
{
- return vhost_set_vring(dev, VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_BASE, ring);
+ return vhost_set_vring(dev, VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_BASE, ring, false);
}
static int vhost_user_set_vring_enable(struct vhost_dev *dev, int enable)
@@ -1234,7 +1235,7 @@ static int vhost_user_set_vring_enable(struct vhost_dev
*dev, int enable)
.num = enable,
};
- ret = vhost_set_vring(dev, VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ENABLE, &state);
+ ret = vhost_set_vring(dev, VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ENABLE, &state, false);
if (ret < 0) {
/*
* Restoring the previous state is likely infeasible, as well as
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] vhost-user: factor out "vhost_user_write_msg", (continued)
[PATCH 4/7] vhost-user: flatten "enforce_reply" into "vhost_user_write_msg", Laszlo Ersek, 2023/08/27
[PATCH 5/7] vhost-user: hoist "write_msg", "get_features", "get_u64", Laszlo Ersek, 2023/08/27
[PATCH 6/7] vhost-user: allow "vhost_set_vring" to wait for a reply,
Laszlo Ersek <=
[PATCH 7/7] vhost-user: call VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ENABLE synchronously, Laszlo Ersek, 2023/08/27
Re: [PATCH 7/7] vhost-user: call VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ENABLE synchronously, Laszlo Ersek, 2023/08/30
Re: [PATCH 7/7] vhost-user: call VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ENABLE synchronously, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2023/08/30