qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw/riscv/virt.c: fix non-KVM --enable-debug build


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw/riscv/virt.c: fix non-KVM --enable-debug build
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 18:26:57 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0

On 8/29/23 16:51, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
The compiler certainly does eliminate 0 && foo(), even at -O0.

There must be something else going on.
Pointer to your tree?

It's this tree:

https://github.com/alistair23/qemu/tree/riscv-to-apply.next


Ok, so while -O0 will eliminate 0 && foo(), it doesn't eliminate with bar() && foo(), where bar must be inlined (multiple times in this case) to find the 0.

Moreover in the case of

/usr/bin/ld: libqemu-riscv64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_intc_riscv_aplic.c.o: in function `riscv_kvm_aplic_request': /home/danielhb/work/qemu/build/../hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c:486: undefined reference to `kvm_set_irq'

this one, where foo (aka riscv_kvm_aplic_request) would have to be eliminated as well. But the compiler won't eliminate entire unused functions with -O0.

This seems to do the trick. Whether it is aesthetically better than what you had with your patches, I will leave to someone else.


r~


diff --git a/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c b/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
index 592c3ce768..0e22dcaf8a 100644
--- a/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/riscv_aplic.c
@@ -481,10 +481,14 @@ static uint32_t riscv_aplic_idc_claimi(RISCVAPLICState *aplic, uint32_t idc)
     return topi;
 }

+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
 static void riscv_kvm_aplic_request(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
 {
     kvm_set_irq(kvm_state, irq, !!level);
 }
+#else
+#define riscv_kvm_aplic_request  ({ qemu_build_not_reached(); NULL; })
+#endif

 static void riscv_aplic_request(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
 {
diff --git a/hw/riscv/virt.c b/hw/riscv/virt.c
index 388e52a294..b787ae38c2 100644
--- a/hw/riscv/virt.c
+++ b/hw/riscv/virt.c
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ static void create_fdt_sockets(RISCVVirtState *s, const MemMapEntry *memmap,
     }

     /* KVM AIA only has one APLIC instance */
-    if (virt_use_kvm_aia(s)) {
+    if (kvm_enabled() && virt_use_kvm_aia(s)) {
         create_fdt_socket_aplic(s, memmap, 0,
                                 msi_m_phandle, msi_s_phandle, phandle,
                                 &intc_phandles[0], xplic_phandles,
@@ -1461,7 +1461,7 @@ static void virt_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
         }
     }

-    if (virt_use_kvm_aia(s)) {
+    if (kvm_enabled() && virt_use_kvm_aia(s)) {
         kvm_riscv_aia_create(machine, IMSIC_MMIO_GROUP_MIN_SHIFT,
                              VIRT_IRQCHIP_NUM_SOURCES, VIRT_IRQCHIP_NUM_MSIS,
                              memmap[VIRT_APLIC_S].base,




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]