qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v22 15/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarization


From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 15/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarization
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 16:47:41 +0200
User-agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38)

On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 11:02 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 01/09/2023 17.58, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> > From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Polarization is changed on a request from the guest.
> > Let's verify the polarization is accordingly set by QEMU.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >   tests/avocado/s390_topology.py | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> > index 3a54fe2e00..d7ee36cb89 100644
> > --- a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> > +++ b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ class S390CPUTopology(QemuSystemTest):
> >       The polarization is changed on a request from the guest.
> >       """
> >       timeout = 90
> > +    event_timeout = 10
> >   
> >       KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE = ('printk.time=0 '
> >                                     'root=/dev/ram '
> > @@ -103,6 +104,14 @@ def kernel_init(self):
> >                            '-initrd', initrd_path,
> >                            '-append', kernel_command_line)
> >   
> > +    def system_init(self):
> > +        self.log.info("System init")
> > +        exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern(self,
> > +                """ mount proc -t proc /proc;
> > +                    mount sys -t sysfs /sys;
> > +                    /bin/cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching """,
> 
> Is the /bin/ prefix really required here?

No, /bin is a symlink to /usr/bin and that's in PATH.
Not sure why Pierre did it this way, might be a remnant of some other
vm image/initrd.
I'll remove it.

> 
> > +                    '0')
> > +
> >       def test_single(self):
> >           """
> >           This test checks the simplest topology with a single CPU.
> > @@ -198,3 +207,39 @@ def test_hotplug_full(self):
> >           self.check_topology(3, 1, 1, 1, 'high', False)
> >           self.check_topology(4, 1, 1, 1, 'medium', False)
> >           self.check_topology(5, 2, 1, 1, 'high', True)
> > +
> > +
> > +    def guest_set_dispatching(self, dispatching):
> > +        exec_command(self,
> > +                f'echo {dispatching} > 
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching')
> > +        self.vm.event_wait('CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE', self.event_timeout)
> > +        exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern(self,
> > +                '/bin/cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching', 
> > dispatching)
> 
> dito?
> 
> > +
> > +    def test_polarization(self):
> > +        """
> > +        This test verifies that QEMU modifies the entitlement change after
> > +        several guest polarization change requests.
> > +
> > +        :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
> > +        :avocado: tags=machine:s390-ccw-virtio
> > +        """
> > +        self.kernel_init()
> > +        self.vm.launch()
> > +        self.wait_until_booted()
> > +
> > +        self.system_init()
> > +        res = self.vm.qmp('query-s390x-cpu-polarization')
> > +        self.assertEqual(res['return']['polarization'], 'horizontal')
> > +        self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> > +
> > +        self.guest_set_dispatching('1');
> > +        res = self.vm.qmp('query-s390x-cpu-polarization')
> > +        self.assertEqual(res['return']['polarization'], 'vertical')
> > +        self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> > +
> > +        self.guest_set_dispatching('0');
> > +        res = self.vm.qmp('query-s390x-cpu-polarization')
> > +        self.assertEqual(res['return']['polarization'], 'horizontal')
> > +        self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> 
> Anyway:
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>

Thanks!




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]