[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
intermittent qtest-aarch64/xlnx-canfd-test test failure
From: |
Michael Tokarev |
Subject: |
intermittent qtest-aarch64/xlnx-canfd-test test failure |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Sep 2023 10:51:55 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 |
Hi!
While doing stable-8.1.1 preparation, I've a CI failure of
ubuntu-20.04-s390x-all here:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5132720046
▶ ERROR:../tests/qtest/xlnx-canfd-test.c:265:match_rx_tx_data: \
assertion failed ((buf_rx[size] & DLC_FD_BIT_MASK) == (buf_tx[size] &
DLC_FD_BIT_MASK)): (2281701376 == 2147483648)
qemu:qtest+qtest-aarch64 / qtest-aarch64/xlnx-canfd-test \
ERROR 0.77s killed by signal 6 SIGABRT
Re-run of this test went successfully. However, the assert looks
a bit scary, and the fact that it does not fail in a reliable way
is a bit troubling too. Is it a flaky test or there's something
else in qemu with concurrent threads?
I don't see this assert in previous test runs. But ubuntu-20.04-s390x-all
test fails quite often due to other reasons, so it isn't conclusive.
Should something be done with this?
The testing is done for commit f2fc49c302036315db6e8c9f74592decc3be0476,
which is in staging-8.1 branch only temporarily.
Thanks,
/mjt
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- intermittent qtest-aarch64/xlnx-canfd-test test failure,
Michael Tokarev <=