qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386/pc: improve physical address space bound check fo


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] hw/i386/pc: improve physical address space bound check for 32-bit systems
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 10:15:11 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0

On 21.09.23 09:17, Ani Sinha wrote:
32-bit systems do not have a reserved memory for hole64 and hotplugging memory
devices are not supported on those systems. Therefore, the maximum limit of the
guest physical address in the absence of additional memory devices effectively
coincides with the end of "above 4G memory space" region. When users configure
additional memory devices, we need to properly account for the additional device
memory region so as to find the maximum value of the guest physical address
and enforce that it is within the physical address space of the processor. For
32-bit, this maximum PA will be outside the range of the processor's address
space.

With this change, for example, previously this was allowed:

$ ./qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu pentium -m size=10G

Now it is no longer allowed:

$ ./qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu pentium -m size=10G
qemu-system-x86_64: Address space limit 0xffffffff < 0x2bfffffff phys-bits too 
low (32)

For 32-bit, hotplugging additional memory is no longer allowed.

"32-bit without PAE/PSE36"


$ ./qemu-system-i386 -m size=1G,maxmem=3G,slots=2
qemu-system-i386: Address space limit 0xffffffff < 0x1ffffffff phys-bits too 
low (32)


We always place the device memory region above 4G. Without PAE/PSE36, you cannot ever possibly make use hotplugged memory, because it would reside > 4g.

So while the user could have started that QEMU instance, even with an OS that would support memory hotplug, a DIMM above 4G would not have been usable.

So we're now properly failing for a setup that doesn't make any sense. Good :)

... if someone ever cares about making that work, we would have to let the device memory region start below 4g (and obviously, not exceed 4g).


So while

./qemu-system-i386 -m size=1G,maxmem=3G,slots=2

fails (because pentium cannot access that memory), what should work is

./qemu-system-i386 -m size=1G,maxmem=3G,slots=2 -cpu pentium2

or

 ./qemu-system-i386 -m size=1G,maxmem=3G,slots=2 -cpu pentium,pse36=on

Because that CPU could actually address that memory somehow (PAE/PSE36).


So IMHO, we're now forbidding setups that are impossible.

The above is still allowed for older machine types in order to support
compatibility. Therefore, this still works:

$ ./qemu-system-i386 -machine pc-i440fx-8.1 -m size=1G,maxmem=3G,slots=2


Makes sense. (probably nobody cares, but better safe than sorry)

After calling CPUID with EAX=0x80000001, all AMD64 compliant processors
have the longmode-capable-bit turned on in the extended feature flags (bit 29)
in EDX. The absence of CPUID longmode can be used to differentiate between
32-bit and 64-bit processors and is the recommended approach. QEMU takes this
approach elsewhere (for example, please see x86_cpu_realizefn()) and with
this change, pc_max_used_gpa() also takes the same approach to detect 32-bit
processors.

Unit tests are modified to not run those tests that use memory hotplug
on 32-bit x86 architecture.

We could use a different CPU (pentium2) to still run these tests. "pentium2" should work I assume?
[...]

@@ -907,12 +907,39 @@ static uint64_t pc_get_cxl_range_end(PCMachineState *pcms)
  static hwaddr pc_max_used_gpa(PCMachineState *pcms, uint64_t pci_hole64_size)
  {
      X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(first_cpu);
+    PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms);
+    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(pcms);
+    uint64_t devmem_start = 0;
+    ram_addr_t devmem_size = 0;
- /* 32-bit systems don't have hole64 thus return max CPU address */
-    if (cpu->phys_bits <= 32) {
-        return ((hwaddr)1 << cpu->phys_bits) - 1;
+    /*
+     * 32-bit systems don't have hole64 but they might have a region for
+     * memory devices. Even if additional hotplugged memory devices might
+     * not be usable by most guest OSes, we need to still consider them for
+     * calculating the highest possible GPA so that we can properly report
+     * if someone configures them on a CPU that cannot possibly address them.
+     */
+    if (!(cpu->env.features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX] & CPUID_EXT2_LM)) {
+        /* 32-bit systems */
+        if (pcmc->fixed_32bit_mem_addr_check) {
+            if (pcmc->has_reserved_memory &&
+                (ms->ram_size < ms->maxram_size)) {
+                pc_get_device_memory_range(pcms, &devmem_start,
+                                           &devmem_size);
+                if (!pcmc->broken_reserved_end) {

I think you can remove that check. "pcmc->fixed_32bit_mem_addr_check && pcmc->broken_reserved_end" can never hold at the same time.

broken_reserved_end is only set for QEMU <= 2.4, to work around another broken check. pcmc->fixed_32bit_mem_addr_check is only set for 8.2+.

Maybe consider calling "fixed_32bit_mem_addr_check" "pcmc->broken_32bit_max_gpa_check" and reverse the logic (treating it like broken_reserved_end).


--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]