qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] vhost: Add a defensive check in vhost_commit against wrong d


From: Eric Auger
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: Add a defensive check in vhost_commit against wrong deallocation
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 15:16:38 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0

Hi Michael,

On 10/3/23 14:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 09:46:57AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> In vhost_commit(), it may happen that dev->mem_sections and
>> dev->tmp_sections are equal,
> Could you please explain a bit more how this can happen?
> I don't see how.
>
>> in which case, unconditionally
>> freeing old_sections at the end of the function will also free
>> dev->mem_sections used on subsequent call leading to a segmentation
>> fault.
>>
>> Check this situation before deallocating memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>> Fixes: c44317efecb2 ("vhost: Build temporary section list and deref
>> after commit")
>> CC: QEMU Stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This SIGSEV condition can be reproduced with
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230904080451.424731-1-eric.auger@redhat.com/#r
>> This is most probably happening in a situation where the memory API is
>> used in a wrong manner but well.
> sounds like misusing the memory API can lead to all kind of mischief.
This happened in a situation where I resized an [IOMMU] MR within the
VFIO vfio_listener_region_add leading to recursive calls ot region_add
callbacks.
The issue is it was not straightforward to find the link with vhost.

Thanks

Eric
>
>> ---
>>  hw/virtio/vhost.c | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>> index e2f6ffb446..c02c599ef0 100644
>> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>> @@ -545,6 +545,11 @@ static void vhost_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
>>      dev->mem_sections = dev->tmp_sections;
>>      dev->n_mem_sections = dev->n_tmp_sections;
>>  
>> +    if (old_sections == dev->mem_sections) {
>> +        assert(n_old_sections ==  dev->n_mem_sections);
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>>      if (dev->n_mem_sections != n_old_sections) {
>>          changed = true;
>>      } else {
>> -- 
>> 2.41.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]