[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] vhost: Add a defensive check in vhost_commit against wrong d
|
From: |
Eric Auger |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] vhost: Add a defensive check in vhost_commit against wrong deallocation |
|
Date: |
Tue, 3 Oct 2023 15:16:38 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 |
Hi Michael,
On 10/3/23 14:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 09:46:57AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> In vhost_commit(), it may happen that dev->mem_sections and
>> dev->tmp_sections are equal,
> Could you please explain a bit more how this can happen?
> I don't see how.
>
>> in which case, unconditionally
>> freeing old_sections at the end of the function will also free
>> dev->mem_sections used on subsequent call leading to a segmentation
>> fault.
>>
>> Check this situation before deallocating memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>> Fixes: c44317efecb2 ("vhost: Build temporary section list and deref
>> after commit")
>> CC: QEMU Stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This SIGSEV condition can be reproduced with
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230904080451.424731-1-eric.auger@redhat.com/#r
>> This is most probably happening in a situation where the memory API is
>> used in a wrong manner but well.
> sounds like misusing the memory API can lead to all kind of mischief.
This happened in a situation where I resized an [IOMMU] MR within the
VFIO vfio_listener_region_add leading to recursive calls ot region_add
callbacks.
The issue is it was not straightforward to find the link with vhost.
Thanks
Eric
>
>> ---
>> hw/virtio/vhost.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>> index e2f6ffb446..c02c599ef0 100644
>> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>> @@ -545,6 +545,11 @@ static void vhost_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
>> dev->mem_sections = dev->tmp_sections;
>> dev->n_mem_sections = dev->n_tmp_sections;
>>
>> + if (old_sections == dev->mem_sections) {
>> + assert(n_old_sections == dev->n_mem_sections);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (dev->n_mem_sections != n_old_sections) {
>> changed = true;
>> } else {
>> --
>> 2.41.0