[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hw/i386/cxl: ensure maxram is greater than ram size for calc
|
From: |
Jonathan Cameron |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hw/i386/cxl: ensure maxram is greater than ram size for calculating cxl range |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:31:04 +0100 |
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:23:35 +0530
Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com> wrote:
> pc_get_device_memory_range() finds the device memory size by calculating the
> difference between maxram and ram sizes. This calculation makes sense only
> when
> maxram is greater than the ram size. Make sure we check for that before
> calling
> pc_get_device_memory_range().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com>
Whilst this is similar to other cases, I can't remember or quickly work
out if the 'else' path here is appropriate. Can we add something to the
patch description to talk about that?
For reference it's:
cxl_base = pc_above_4g_end(pcms);
> ---
> hw/i386/pc.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index f72e2c3b35..948c58171c 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -820,10 +820,12 @@ static void pc_get_device_memory_range(PCMachineState
> *pcms,
> static uint64_t pc_get_cxl_range_start(PCMachineState *pcms)
> {
> PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms);
> + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(pcms);
> hwaddr cxl_base;
> ram_addr_t size;
>
> - if (pcmc->has_reserved_memory) {
> + if (pcmc->has_reserved_memory &&
> + (ms->ram_size < ms->maxram_size)) {
> pc_get_device_memory_range(pcms, &cxl_base, &size);
> cxl_base += size;
> } else {