Re: [PATCH] vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict

[Viresh Kumar]

On 17-10-23, 09:51, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> Not that I’m really opposed to that, but I don’t see the problem with just
> doing that in the same work that makes qemu actually use this flag, exactly
> because it’s just a -1/+1 change.
> 
> I can send a v2, but should I do the same for libvhost-user and define the
> flag there?  Do I have to add a patch to do the same for F_STATUS, which so
> far only got a placeholder comment?

Sure, that's fine too.

-- 
viresh