|
| From: | Albert Esteve |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Oct 2023 10:25:46 +0200 |
On 17-10-23, 09:51, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> Not that I’m really opposed to that, but I don’t see the problem with just
> doing that in the same work that makes qemu actually use this flag, exactly
> because it’s just a -1/+1 change.
>
> I can send a v2, but should I do the same for libvhost-user and define the
> flag there? Do I have to add a patch to do the same for F_STATUS, which so
> far only got a placeholder comment?
Sure, that's fine too.
--
viresh
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |