[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: define policy forbidding use of "AI" / LLM code ge

From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: define policy forbidding use of "AI" / LLM code generators
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 06:02:46 -0500

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:43:05AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 10:42, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:33:49AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > > That probably means we can never use even open source LLMs to generate
> > > code for QEMU because while the source data is all open source it won't
> > > necessarily be GPL compatible.
> >
> > I would probably wait until the dust settles before we start accepting
> > LLM generated code.
> I think that's pretty much my take on what this policy is:
> "say no for now; we can always come back later when the legal
> situation seems clearer".

Absolutely. So I think we should not try and venture into terminology
such as what is ai or try and promote legal copyright theories.
ATM there's no good reason for someone who did not write the code
to put their DCO on the code. If it is not clear who wrote the code
because it was generated and not written then we don't want it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]