[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH 1/2] backends/iommufd: Remove check on number of backend user
|
From: |
Duan, Zhenzhong |
|
Subject: |
RE: [PATCH 1/2] backends/iommufd: Remove check on number of backend users |
|
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jan 2024 01:40:36 +0000 |
Hi Cédric,
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 8:32 PM
>To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>Cc: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>; Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>; Duan,
>Zhenzhong <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>; Cédric Le Goater
><clg@redhat.com>
>Subject: [PATCH 1/2] backends/iommufd: Remove check on number of
>backend users
>
>QOM already has a ref count on objects and it will assert much
>earlier, when INT_MAX is reached.
>
>Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
IIUC, /dev/iommu is opened on demand, be->users is used to catch underflow
or overflow due to mismatched iommufd_backend_connect/disconnect
pairs. It looks different from object ref count in purpose, but I agree
a correctly written code will never trigger such overflow/underflow.
So, for the series:
Reviewed-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
BRs.
Zhenzhong
>---
> backends/iommufd.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/backends/iommufd.c b/backends/iommufd.c
>index
>ba58a0eb0d0ba9aae625c987eb728547543dba66..393c0d9a3719e3de1a6b
>51a8ff2e75e184badc82 100644
>--- a/backends/iommufd.c
>+++ b/backends/iommufd.c
>@@ -80,11 +80,6 @@ int iommufd_backend_connect(IOMMUFDBackend
>*be, Error **errp)
> int fd, ret = 0;
>
> qemu_mutex_lock(&be->lock);
>- if (be->users == UINT32_MAX) {
>- error_setg(errp, "too many connections");
>- ret = -E2BIG;
>- goto out;
>- }
> if (be->owned && !be->users) {
> fd = qemu_open_old("/dev/iommu", O_RDWR);
> if (fd < 0) {
>--
>2.43.0
- [PATCH 0/2] backends/iommufd: Remove mutex, Cédric Le Goater, 2024/01/02
- [PATCH 2/2] backends/iommufd: Remove mutex, Cédric Le Goater, 2024/01/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] backends/iommufd: Remove mutex, Eric Auger, 2024/01/02
- RE: [PATCH 0/2] backends/iommufd: Remove mutex, Duan, Zhenzhong, 2024/01/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] backends/iommufd: Remove mutex, Cédric Le Goater, 2024/01/04