qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 22/22] Revert "tests/avocado: remove skips from replay_kernel"


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [PULL 22/22] Revert "tests/avocado: remove skips from replay_kernel"
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 13:11:42 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 1.11.27; emacs 29.1

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 at 11:11, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> This reverts commit c2ef5ee89d76f0ab77c4dd6a1c9eeed4d35d20ed.
>>
>> While the fixes for #2010 and #2013 have improved things locally it
>> seems GitLab still continues to be flaky.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/avocado/replay_kernel.py b/tests/avocado/replay_kernel.py
>> index 6fdcbd6ac3d..1eaa36444cb 100644
>> --- a/tests/avocado/replay_kernel.py
>> +++ b/tests/avocado/replay_kernel.py
>> @@ -98,10 +98,13 @@ def test_i386_pc(self):
>>
>>          self.run_rr(kernel_path, kernel_command_line, console_pattern, 
>> shift=5)
>>
>> +    # See https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2010
>> +    @skipUnless(os.getenv('QEMU_TEST_FLAKY_TESTS'), 'Test sometimes gets 
>> stuck')
>>      def test_x86_64_pc(self):
>>          """
>>          :avocado: tags=arch:x86_64
>>          :avocado: tags=machine:pc
>> +        :avocado: tags=flaky
>>          """
>>          kernel_url = 
>> ('https://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora'
>>                        
>> '/linux/releases/29/Everything/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot'
>> @@ -132,6 +135,8 @@ def test_mips_malta(self):
>>
>>          self.run_rr(kernel_path, kernel_command_line, console_pattern, 
>> shift=5)
>>
>> +    # See https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2013
>> +    @skipUnless(os.getenv('QEMU_TEST_FLAKY_TESTS'), 'Test is unstable on 
>> GitLab')
>>      def test_mips64el_malta(self):
>>          """
>>          This test requires the ar tool to extract "data.tar.gz" from
>
> These gitlab issues are both currently closed -- if we think the
> problem is still present and are re-introducing the skip lines,
> we should re-open the issues, I think.

Hmm - I certainly fixed some bugs under those two. I think I'll re-spin
with a new bug raised.

>
>
> thanks
> -- PMM

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]