[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL 00/17] CI job updates, header cleanups and other misc patches
|
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PULL 00/17] CI job updates, header cleanups and other misc patches |
|
Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 2024 08:55:09 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) |
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:11:41AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 24/04/2024 18.21, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 4/24/24 00:57, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > The following changes since commit
> > > 13b1e9667737132440f4d500c31cb69320c6b15a:
> > >
> > > Merge tag 'for-upstream' of https://gitlab.com/bonzini/qemu into
> > > staging (2024-04-23 17:35:57 -0700)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu.git tags/pull-request-2024-04-24
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 8f29bab03ea22694a127ee33edeb4ce99eeb124e:
> > >
> > > target/s390x: Remove KVM stubs in cpu_models.h (2024-04-24 09:45:02
> > > +0200)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > * Update OpenBSD CI image to 7.5
> > > * Update/remove Ubuntu 20.04 CI jobs
> > > * Update CentOS 8 CI jobs to CentOS 9
> > > * Some clean-ups and improvements to travis.yml
> > > * Minor test fixes
> > > * s390x header clean-ups
> > > * Doc updates
> >
> > This introduces a failure in the migration-compat-x86_64 job:
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/6707154868
>
> It wasn't failing for me:
>
> https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu/-/jobs/6702058896
>
> And according to the diffstat of my pull request, it's only touching test
> files, docs, and s390x stuff, so I somehow fail to see how it could
> influence x86 migration at a first glance. It also looks like the job is
> running on opensuse, and not on CentOS or Ubuntu, so it should likely not be
> influenced by the changes in this PR.
>
> Could you please hit the re-run button of that job? If it then passes, we're
> likely rather facing an intermitted failure that might have been introduced
> earlier already...
The specific job that's failiing is the multifd cancellation test.
This is exactly the kind of functional area of migration where
non-deterministic failures are likely to appear. So one for the
migration maintainers to look at most likely.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
- [PULL 12/17] tests: Update our CI to use CentOS Stream 9 instead of 8, (continued)
- [PULL 12/17] tests: Update our CI to use CentOS Stream 9 instead of 8, Thomas Huth, 2024/04/24
- [PULL 13/17] ci: move external build environment setups to CentOS Stream 9, Thomas Huth, 2024/04/24
- [PULL 14/17] hw/s390x: Include missing 'cpu.h' header, Thomas Huth, 2024/04/24
- [PULL 15/17] docs/devel: fix minor typo in submitting-a-patch.rst, Thomas Huth, 2024/04/24
- [PULL 16/17] tests/unit: Remove debug statements in test-nested-aio-poll.c, Thomas Huth, 2024/04/24
- [PULL 17/17] target/s390x: Remove KVM stubs in cpu_models.h, Thomas Huth, 2024/04/24
- Re: [PULL 00/17] CI job updates, header cleanups and other misc patches, Richard Henderson, 2024/04/24