[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] i386/sev: Implement ConfidentialGuestSupport functi
From: |
Roy Hopkins |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] i386/sev: Implement ConfidentialGuestSupport functions for SEV |
Date: |
Tue, 07 May 2024 15:34:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.50.2 |
On Tue, 2024-04-16 at 15:30 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:11:39PM +0100, Roy Hopkins wrote:
> > The ConfidentialGuestSupport object defines a number of virtual
> > functions that are called during processing of IGVM directives to query
> > or configure initial guest state. In order to support processing of IGVM
> > files, these functions need to be implemented by relevant isolation
> > hardware support code such as SEV.
> >
> > This commit implements the required functions for SEV-ES and adds
> > support for processing IGVM files for configuring the guest.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roy Hopkins <roy.hopkins@suse.com>
> > ---
> > target/i386/sev.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/i386/sev.c b/target/i386/sev.c
> > index 31dfdc3fe5..46313e7024 100644
> > --- a/target/i386/sev.c
> > +++ b/target/i386/sev.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> > #include "qapi/qapi-commands-misc-target.h"
> > #include "exec/confidential-guest-support.h"
> > #include "hw/i386/pc.h"
> > +#include "hw/i386/e820_memory_layout.h"
> > #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
> >
> > #define TYPE_SEV_GUEST "sev-guest"
> > @@ -170,6 +171,9 @@ static const char *const sev_fw_errlist[] = {
> >
> > #define SEV_FW_MAX_ERROR ARRAY_SIZE(sev_fw_errlist)
> >
> > +static int sev_launch_update_data(SevGuestState *sev_guest, uint8_t *addr,
> > + uint64_t len);
> > +
> > static int
> > sev_ioctl(int fd, int cmd, void *data, int *error)
> > {
> > @@ -304,6 +308,14 @@ sev_guest_finalize(Object *obj)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > +static int cgs_check_support(ConfidentialGuestPlatformType platform,
> > + uint16_t platform_version, uint8_t
> > highest_vtl,
> > + uint64_t shared_gpa_boundary)
> > +{
> > + return (((platform == CGS_PLATFORM_SEV_ES) && sev_es_enabled()) ||
> > + ((platform == CGS_PLATFORM_SEV) && sev_enabled())) ? 1 : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void sev_apply_cpu_context(CPUState *cpu)
> > {
> > SevGuestState *sev_guest = SEV_GUEST(MACHINE(qdev_get_machine())->cgs);
> > @@ -384,6 +396,54 @@ static void sev_apply_cpu_context(CPUState *cpu)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static int check_vmsa_supported(const struct sev_es_save_area *vmsa)
> > +{
> > + struct sev_es_save_area vmsa_check;
> > + size_t i;
> > + /*
> > + * Clear all supported fields so we can then check the entire structure
> > + * is zero.
> > + */
> > + memcpy(&vmsa_check, vmsa, sizeof(struct sev_es_save_area));
> > + memset(&vmsa_check.es, 0, sizeof(vmsa_check.es));
> > + memset(&vmsa_check.cs, 0, sizeof(vmsa_check.cs));
> > + memset(&vmsa_check.ss, 0, sizeof(vmsa_check.ss));
> > + memset(&vmsa_check.ds, 0, sizeof(vmsa_check.ds));
> > + memset(&vmsa_check.fs, 0, sizeof(vmsa_check.fs));
> > + memset(&vmsa_check.gs, 0, sizeof(vmsa_check.gs));
> > + vmsa_check.efer = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.cr0 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.cr3 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.cr4 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.xcr0 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.dr6 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.dr7 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.rax = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.rcx = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.rdx = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.rbx = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.rsp = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.rbp = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.rsi = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.rdi = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.r8 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.r9 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.r10 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.r11 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.r12 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.r13 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.r14 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.r15 = 0;
> > + vmsa_check.rip = 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(vmsa_check); ++i) {
> > + if (((uint8_t *)&vmsa_check)[i]) {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return 1;
>
> Can this just be:
>
> return !buffer_is_zero(vmsa_check, sizeof(vmsa_check))
>
>
> > +}
> > +
> > static int sev_set_cpu_context(uint16_t cpu_index, const void *ctx,
> > uint32_t ctx_len, hwaddr gpa)
> > {
> > @@ -446,6 +506,77 @@ static int sev_set_cpu_context(uint16_t cpu_index,
> > const void *ctx,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int cgs_set_guest_state(hwaddr gpa, uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len,
> > + ConfidentialGuestPageType memory_type,
> > + uint16_t cpu_index, Error **errp)
> > +{
> > + SevGuestState *sev = SEV_GUEST(MACHINE(qdev_get_machine())->cgs);
> > + int ret = 1;
>
> This results in a return '1' in some errors, but several of the callers
> are checking '< 0' for the error condition. This variable is redundant
> anyway, i'd suggest just putting 'return -1' calls after error_setg
>
> > +
> > + if (!sev_enabled()) {
> > + error_setg(errp, "%s: attempt to configure guest memory, but SEV "
> > + "is not enabled",
> > + __func__);
> > + } else if (memory_type == CGS_PAGE_TYPE_VMSA) {
> > + if (!sev_es_enabled()) {
> > + error_setg(errp,
> > + "%s: attempt to configure initial VMSA, but SEV-ES "
> > + "is not supported",
> > + __func__);
> > + } else {
> > + if (!check_vmsa_supported((const struct sev_es_save_area
> > *)ptr)) {
> > + error_setg(errp,
> > + "%s: The VMSA contains fields that are not "
> > + "synchronized with KVM. Continuing would result
> > in "
> > + "either unpredictable guest behavior, or a "
> > + "mismatched launch measurement.",
> > + __func__);
> > + } else {
> > + ret = sev_set_cpu_context(cpu_index, ptr, len, gpa);
>
> This needs to set 'errp' if 'ret' is non-zero, or assert
> that it is always zer0.
>
> > + }
> > + }
> > + } else if ((memory_type == CGS_PAGE_TYPE_ZERO) ||
> > + (memory_type == CGS_PAGE_TYPE_NORMAL)) {
> > + ret = sev_launch_update_data(sev, ptr, len);
>
> Likewise needs to set 'errp' or assert.
>
> > + } else if (memory_type != CGS_PAGE_TYPE_UNMEASURED) {
> > + error_setg(
> > + errp,
> > + "%s: attempted to configure guest memory to use memory_type %d,
> > "
> > + "but this type is not supported",
> > + __func__, (int)memory_type);
> > + }
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
Thanks Daniel, I'll be addressing all of these in the next version.
Regards,
Roy
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] i386/sev: Implement ConfidentialGuestSupport functions for SEV,
Roy Hopkins <=