Re: [PATCH v2 05/24] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp

[Richard Henderson]

On 8/1/24 16:59, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> hmm... you've suggested below to use `aarch64_tr_translate_insn` and
> check if it's the first instruction.
> and put the check there.
> In that case I won't need FCFI_LP_EXPECTED TB flag.
> Then I would rather use it as FCFI_ENABLED TB flag.

You will need both bits.


r~