[PULL 18/28] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Don't decrement pfl->counter below 0

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

In pflash_write() Coverity points out that we can decrement the
unsigned pfl->counter below zero, which makes it wrap around.  In
fact this is harmless, because if pfl->counter is 0 at this point we
also increment pfl->wcycle to 3, and the wcycle == 3 handling doesn't
look at counter; the only way back into code which looks at the
counter value is via wcycle == 1, which will reinitialize the counter.
But it's arguably a little clearer to break early in the "counter ==
0" if(), to avoid the decrement-below-zero.

Resolves: Coverity CID 1547611
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240731143617.3391947-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
 hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
index c8f1cf5a87..2f3d1dd509 100644
--- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
+++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
@@ -614,6 +614,7 @@ static void pflash_write(PFlashCFI01 *pfl, hwaddr offset,
             if (!pfl->counter) {
                 trace_pflash_write(pfl->name, "block write finished");
                 pfl->wcycle++;
+                break;
             }
 
             pfl->counter--;
-- 
2.45.2