[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/5] ebpf: add formal error reporting to all APIs
|
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 3/5] ebpf: add formal error reporting to all APIs |
|
Date: |
Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:20:02 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) |
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 05:11:55PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/8/24 16:56, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The eBPF code is currently reporting error messages through trace
> > events. Trace events are fine for debugging, but they are not to be
> > considered the primary error reporting mechanism, as their output
> > is inaccessible to callers.
> >
> > This adds an "Error **errp" parameter to all methods which have
> > important error scenarios to report to the caller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > ebpf/ebpf_rss.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > ebpf/ebpf_rss.h | 10 +++++---
> > hw/net/virtio-net.c | 7 +++---
> > 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c b/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c
> > index aa7170d997..59854c8b51 100644
> > --- a/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c
> > +++ b/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c
> > @@ -47,13 +47,14 @@ bool ebpf_rss_is_loaded(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> > return ctx != NULL && (ctx->obj != NULL || ctx->program_fd != -1);
> > }
> > -static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> > +static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx, Error **errp)
> > {
> > ctx->mmap_configuration = mmap(NULL, qemu_real_host_page_size(),
> > PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
> > ctx->map_configuration, 0);
> > if (ctx->mmap_configuration == MAP_FAILED) {
> > trace_ebpf_error("eBPF RSS", "can not mmap eBPF configuration
> > array");
> > + error_setg(errp, "Unable to map eBPF configuration array");
> > return false;
> > }
> > ctx->mmap_toeplitz_key = mmap(NULL, qemu_real_host_page_size(),
> > @@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> > ctx->map_toeplitz_key, 0);
> > if (ctx->mmap_toeplitz_key == MAP_FAILED) {
> > trace_ebpf_error("eBPF RSS", "can not mmap eBPF toeplitz key");
> > + error_setg(errp, "Unable to map eBPF toeplitz array");
> > goto toeplitz_fail;
> > }
> > ctx->mmap_indirections_table = mmap(NULL, qemu_real_host_page_size(),
> > @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> > ctx->map_indirections_table, 0);
> > if (ctx->mmap_indirections_table == MAP_FAILED) {
> > trace_ebpf_error("eBPF RSS", "can not mmap eBPF indirection
> > table");
> > + error_setg(errp, "Unable to map eBPF indirection array");
>
> Aren't these trace_ebpf_error() calls redundant now?
Yes & no. Errors propagated up the call stack don't get included in
any trace output, and so if a caller doesn't log them anywhere they
can thus be invisible to someone just looking at trace output.
I could remove them all from the eBPF code though, and put a single
trace event in the hw/net/virtio-net.c file instead ? Bit of a bike
shed colouring exercise to decide which is best though.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
[PATCH 5/5] ebpf: improve trace event coverage to all key operations, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2024/08/06